Jtotheb

joined 3 years ago
[–] Jtotheb@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

Fitting username. Explaining this to people irl who respect and listen to me is hard; can’t imagine trying to inform someone online who’s simultaneously trying to win the conversation you’re having

[–] Jtotheb@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

What’s neat about an open poll like the one they ran is that it includes most of the people who care about weighing in. Maybe you can read an AI summary about statistically relevant sample sizes? It might be more useful to learn about the math, or to skip the summary and find a useful website, like this calculator from Qualtrics that will show you that a sample size of 175,000 is more than 10 times what you’d need to achieve a roughly 99% level of confidence with a 1% margin of error.

[–] Jtotheb@lemmy.world 9 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (8 children)

We’re talking about the same duckduckgo that had a huge poll about this right? The only data point that exists regarding what people want is that of the 175,354 users who took the poll, only 10% wanted AI features.

[–] Jtotheb@lemmy.world 14 points 1 month ago (5 children)

You bundle and sell subprime mortgages every day?

[–] Jtotheb@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

You haven’t said anything.

[–] Jtotheb@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (3 children)

Sorry, a couple of notes and I’m out of your hair. The election cycle is not 1459 days unless you’re not voting; I’ve never called myself an accelerationist nor said I don’t vote for democrats down the ballot; don’t co-opt people who are dying on the streets if you are staying inside.

[–] Jtotheb@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago (5 children)

My argument, were anyone interested in hearing it rather than themselves, would be that there is nothing magical about voting, which is just one of many forms of representation. Acting as though you have done the long hard work of democracy because you turn in a ballot every once in a while for local representatives you do not know and will never pressure is sad. You care more about institutional longevity than human suffering; you think democracy is regular elections not self governance. You will happily vote for the lesser of two evils because you don’t like how much work it would take to do even better than the options you are spoon fed by billionaires who would kill your neighbors if it improved the S&P by half a point. England is undermining trial by jury with secret judicial rulings. Guantanamo Bay still holds human beings “outside the law.” All across the “civilized” world, protests against this grotesque misrepresentation of the public will are subject to approval. Where is your evidence that you can vote this away? You hold back progress with this idea that you will be handed back your power if you are patient enough.

[–] Jtotheb@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I don’t. Do you think they’ll go away if you vote?

[–] Jtotheb@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago (7 children)

if you voted for [Democrat] would [bad thing] still happen in [foreign place]

Yeah obviously. Do you understand how many different Democrat administrations have funded various genocides, dictatorships, and hostile takeovers of self governing people

[–] Jtotheb@lemmy.world -5 points 1 month ago (12 children)

I do not consider a teenager fresh to current events disagreeing with me on politics as much of a gotcha moment. If you’re older than I’ve guessed you should consider learning more before you try to transition into educating. If every single citizen of the united states who still has the right to vote casts a ballot for Kamala Harris, Palestine still burns, and Palantir still revolutionizes killing and incarcerating people elsewhere. But maybe there’s still pride at Target. Is that what you mean by viable?

view more: next ›