You should start a non profit to buy and protect old and rare books.
CanIFishHere
joined 5 months ago
Not every law is a moral debate. Laws limiting the height of my fence is not a moral debate.
Remember the guy who bought an 'art' banana for $6m and then ate it? That also wasn't a moral debate.
If you pass a law protecting rare valuable books, then you also need to decide which books are protected.
What do you think is the appropriate action to this? When you start to establish laws based on evil behaviour, you eventually get witch trials.
Are you suggesting we have food and art police? Would a government body decide what I am allowed or not allowed to do with my wagyu steak? Having freedoms sometimes mean we have to accept the actions of others we disagree with.
If I buy a book, it is not illegal to destroy it. Your analogy doesn't work. You are talking about acts that could affect the health and well being of others.
This is a weird one. If I buy a book, rare or not, do I not own it?
To be honest, I didn't care enough to do any additional research, much like yourself.
Google handles over 90% of all worldwide web searches. Bing is in second with 5% and DuckDuckGo at under 1%. Statcounter 2026 numbers.
My Google search still offers up an 'AI mode' button.
The story says active users.
If it's a Taiwanese publication, then it must be true.
If you don't recognize advances in research as a benefit, I'm done. Thanks.
view more: next ›
MacOs' greatest strength against malware was a small install base.