BarbecueCowboy

joined 2 years ago

I think how often you get called out on your spelling mistakes really just depends on how deeply wrong your opinions are, so congrats.

[–] BarbecueCowboy@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

I always wondered how we planned for dissipating heat in space to be comparable to dissipating heat on earth. Feels like whatever they're using to handle that heat is going to have to be huge and heavy.

Has to be great for avoiding any legal obligations on how you might handle the data though. Can do whatever you want as long as it stays in space.

[–] BarbecueCowboy@lemmy.dbzer0.com 27 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I have comments about your first question, but they're mostly stupid on my end. I think the problem for most is related to your 2nd question. Google is doing it's google thing where they do a lot to force adoption with a goal of doing nothing to support it. Combine with a general distrust of Google.

I've got my problems with Canada, but y'all sure know how to screw.

I think it's mostly because above spelled it wrong and it made it just different enough that we thought it was a new word.

[–] BarbecueCowboy@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 2 months ago

I heard there was some new AI model that was so amazing for cyber security that they had to limit access to it. It's just too bad Anthropic couldn't use that.

[–] BarbecueCowboy@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (3 children)

Around non-specifically 50% compared to as high as 29.999% doesn't seem like a huge delta. I wonder what the real number on both is.

Edit: Looks like it was 52.4 and 29.1 respectively. The numbers on how much they trust the responses later in the article might be more worrying.