this post was submitted on 24 Jul 2026
60 points (98.4% liked)

Technology

87469 readers
3411 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/49851746

Big Tech is moving towards fossil fuels, coincidentally this is happening after the hopped on the Trump-Train, $$$ are calling ;)

top 5 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Meta: "We're getting into VR, it's the next big thing."

VR Market Crashes

Meta: "Well, no sweat, we can just pivot to NFTs"

NFT Market Crashes

Meta: "Shit, damn. Okay, we can just migrate all our efforts to AI. That's booming right now."

AI Market Tilts Alarmingly

Meta: "Fuck! Fuck! We should... uh... Fossil Fuels! We should do Fossil Fuels! That's always a safe bet."

[–] ParlimentOfDoom@piefed.zip 4 points 1 month ago

The fossil fuels is BECAUSE of the LLM datacenters.

[–] madeindex@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣 you read Marky Marks entire strategy, are you psychic?! Guess we all know how this will end up then: https://lemmy.world/post/48573158

[–] Eternal192@anarchist.nexus 5 points 1 month ago

Why were they even considered a part of it?

Not like Meta did anything to help the planet.

They probably threw a lot of cash at someone to help them look more eco friendly.

[–] 9point6@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

A GDPR style carbon fine needs to be a retroactively applied thing to these hyperscale companies.

Every thousand tonnes of carbon they put into the atmosphere should be taxed at 1% of their year's revenue, not profit.

You want to put 100,000 tonnes of carbon into the atmosphere in a given year? That should cost you everything you make.

For scale: Elon Musk's XAi data centres are currently puking 6 million tonnes out a year. That's double the carbon output of the UK