Source (Mastodon)
id still take 7 over 10. can't recall anything specifically in ten that I used.
this post was submitted on 17 Dec 2025
2 points (100.0% liked)
furry_irl
2233 readers
109 users here now
"For the fur in u"
Welcome to Furry_irl, a community for furry memes, shitposts, and other relatable images or comics.
Community rules:
- Code of Conduct — Follow our instance rules.
- Post formatting — All titles should be a single word, followed by _irl. An emoji may substitute the underscore.
- Credit artists — If it's not your art, include who made it in the title or the post body. Links are appreciated, except to X/Twitter.
- Stay on topic — Images should contain or be related to furries. Images should be relatable or a meme. This isn't the place for general art posts.
- Avoid AI images — Our fandom has countless artists, please share their (or your own) labors of love instead.
- Don't be a jerk — Have tact, don't antagonize other posters.
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
Windows 10 was good? I missed that consensus meeting. :(
In my experience: Win 10 LTSC was really quite nice (for windows), win10 pro was okay after a bit of work, win10 home was a burning pile of sweaty diapers.
All home version are horrific even xp home was bad.
People always judge "good" windows versions by how they were at end of life. Xp was dogshit it was so bad. 10 was also complete dogshit for rhe first few years.
Actually, the "good" Windows was Windows 9, that was never released. So it goes bad 8, godd but non-existent 9, bad 10. Than break of the cycle and bad again - 11.
7 lower on the good scale than 10??? What did the author smoke? 10 should be juuuust above the zero line.
Idk, I never liked Windows 10. It was better than 8, but I never thought it was good. XP was the last good Windows.
microsoft has never made a good windows
Hot take: 8.1 is better than 10
I liked 7.
My timeline of Windowses (that I have an opinion on) would be as follows:
3.1: Decent. Not exactly MacOS or OS/2 but still decent.
95: Good. Solid upgrade over 3.1.
98: Good if unexciting as an upgrade over 95 OSR2.
98 SE: Why did this even exist?
Me: Terrible. They had some good ideas but botched the execution.
2000: Great. My favorite Windows until XP overtook it with SP2.
XP: Good initially, great starting with SP2. The only Windows that technically supported custom themes via a hacked theme DLL.
Vista: Nice try but ultimately bad due to being premature.
7: Really good and actually good-looking out of the box.
8: Utter trash that demonstrated how Microsoft had lost sight of user needs. Also marks the start of the extremely ugly UI period.
8.1: A slight improvement over 8 but not enough to qualify as good.
10: Well, it's better than 8 but that's it. The UI is still butt ugly, Windows Update is so unreliable it might as well be malware, the configuration is scattered randomly over the place... At least it was free.
11: Possibly worse than Me. It's a bit less ugly than 10 but that's it on the plus side. The new features are unremarkable at best and actively harmful at worst and while the UI is less ugly it's also ridiculously slow for what it does.
It's not exactly a tick-tock thing with Windows. It kinda sorta looks like it if we consider 98/SE, 2000/XP, and 8/8.1 to be one Windows each but even then it's a stretch that requires 10's "less bad than 8" to count as "good".
Saying Windows 11 is better looking than 10 is crazy to me, it took 10s awful settings UI and applied it across the system. But I prefer functional UI vs "fancy".
When Windows 11 came out everyone was saying that Microsoft finally broke the good/bad cycle.
I always tought it was unusable garbage. Finally I'm being proven right lol
Really??? I never got that, the consensus was it was a pile of shit from the get go. It's why Microsoft had to go extra hard with shoving it down our throats and literally forcing PCs to update.