this post was submitted on 02 Sep 2026
537 points (99.3% liked)

Technology

87814 readers
3508 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] deaconblackhorse@lemmy.world 44 points 1 day ago (1 children)

But you don't get to enjoy copyrighted materiel yourself

[–] UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml 18 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

"Rent it again if you love it so much."

[–] godsammitdam@lemmy.zip 23 points 1 day ago

Where's all the people shouting how awesome capitalism is, private ownership, the communists will come steal everything from you.

Here come capitalists to steal everything you own so they can make more money. Copyright, shmopyright. They've also got eminent domain on their side to build walls and data centers

[–] 100_kg_90_de_belin@feddit.it 3 points 1 day ago

Yeah, the forms of government propped up by capitalism tend to side with capitalism.

[–] ramble81@lemmy.zip 27 points 1 day ago (3 children)

So literally the Chinese approach to copyright and IP law.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech 35 points 2 days ago (3 children)

From me just looking at it, everything they're trying to do to force US AI supremacy seems to just generate and cause even more pushback. Ban cards to China? China's ramping up GPU supplying and separating from US dominated supply chains. Ban model exports? They'll make cheaper and easier models. Idk, whenever you force the market it usually backfires in ways you can't expect.

[–] Telorand@reddthat.com 33 points 2 days ago (3 children)

The thing is, they're trying to force the market by actual force rather than slow and methodical coercion. US hegemony is over, because the buffoon in chief, who is terrible at domestic business, is also bad at foreign business. Shocking, I know.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] northendtrooper@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

So what I'm hearing is we now get to have our own Mickey Mouse and Pokemon ripoffs if they are down through OpenAI.

[–] Grimy@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

You can make a pokemon ripoff with Photoshop, should Photoshop be illegal? Is it the tools fault or the user's fault?

[–] soyslurper2@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Misleading title from Techcrunch. It's the Trump Administration only (which we already know)

[–] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Is there another US government?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] GreenKnight23@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago (2 children)

gonna start my own darknet with a 56k bandwidth limit.

shit was simpler 30 years ago because nothing advanced enough could use such a slow connection.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] SaharaMaleikuhm@feddit.org 15 points 1 day ago (3 children)

And now complain again that the Chinese are stealing from you.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] bss03@infosec.pub 9 points 1 day ago

It's mostly a nothing-burger right now:

This new Trump administration brief is not a ruling, as the case is being tried in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, and the authors of the brief do not have jurisdiction.

The U.S. copyright office somewhat contradicts the brief:

The training process [also] implicates the right of reproduction.

-- https://www.copyright.gov/ai/ Part 3, III, B.

Tho, the same documents do mention that "fair use" defenses can apply, but as always they depend on a lot of factors specific to individual acts of possible infringement.

[–] orioler25@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

"Leadership," well, here's hopin they find a way to materialize intellectual property and speculative investment, since that's like, the only metrics they use and neither of them are actually, y'know, real.

[–] JoMiran@lemmy.ml 16 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

THIS JUST IN!:
Anna's Archive to be renamed AI Training Repository of America.

The lawsuits will drop, right?

[–] ContactClosure@lemmus.org 2 points 1 day ago

Fuck the US government and fuck OpenAI

[–] jjlinux@lemmy.zip 16 points 2 days ago

Between that bullshit argument and "to protect the children" they are getting away with incredible, fuck, with everything.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›