Grimy

joined 3 years ago
[–] Grimy@lemmy.world 11 points 6 days ago (1 children)

The suicide probably makes it even more difficult for his family. Poor girl probably blames herself. (She shouldn't to be clear but still)

[–] Grimy@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

How long before they ban all the open source models and hand a monopoly to the ones they are pretending to be mad at?

They want to treat software like a gun, they certainly won't let us run any of it on our own computers. It's a shame to see so many cheer for this.

[–] Grimy@lemmy.world 6 points 2 weeks ago

His comic is open source. Might seem like a moot point seeing as how most comics can be seen on the web for free but it lets people use it for other stuff. From what I understand, a few of his comics have been turned into short animations and things like that. Kind of cool tbh.

[–] Grimy@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago

My point is that once you can't tell, then you'll go back to judging a comic how you used to (a mix of art content + message content)

Right now, you first look if it's AI or not and toss it in the bin if it is. That's fine but are you going to start chasing down Krita files for everything you see in a month?

We are seriously close to not being to tell if a comic is AI generated, and I'm talking about raw output from a two sentence prompt.

[–] Grimy@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children)

Not the only value, just that it's the main one. Because we read comics to be entertained, not to marvel at someone's drawing talent. If comics were only about art quality, then we wouldn't have stick figure and paint drawings getting upvotes either.

Like I said, having something hand drawn well is always a huge positive, but it doesn't make up for trite low denominator content.

Good content + art > good content + AI > bad content + art

Going Art > AI no matter what just means you have little perspective and live your life through knee jerk reactions.

If you go just by content, his comics suck, deal with it.

[–] Grimy@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

It's crazy to imagine someone judging something on the value and enjoyment it brings them.

[–] Grimy@lemmy.world -2 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (7 children)

It means that once the comic output from AI is indistinguishable from the output of an artist, then people will stop concentrating on the tools used and go back to judging a comic on if it was funny or entertaining.

This guy draws really well but none of his comics are good. It's all trite boring pandering.

To be clear, I'm not saying hand made art has no value, just that a shit joke isn't somehow better than a good one just because of the tools used.

Good content + real art > Good content + AI > boring content + real art

[–] Grimy@lemmy.world -1 points 2 weeks ago (9 children)

If it's any consolation, we are nearing the point where it's legit impossible to tell and people will slowly go back to caring about the content instead.

[–] Grimy@lemmy.world 3 points 3 weeks ago

Are they actually asking for phone numbers now?

[–] Grimy@lemmy.world 14 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

They are only doing one segment of users at a time and I'm guessing their metrics are telling them 90% of those users don't play ball and just stop visiting. I'm guessing they might go back on it in a bit.

207
TessNote (lemmy.world)
submitted 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago) by Grimy@lemmy.world to c/memes@lemmy.world
 
 
0
submitted 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) by Grimy@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world
 

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE

This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Decoupling America’s Artificial Intelligence Capabilities from China Act of 2025’’.

SEC. 3. PROHIBITIONS ON IMPORT AND EXPORT OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE OR GENERATIVE ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE TECHNOLOGY OR INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY

(a) PROHIBITION ON IMPORTATION.—On and after the date that is 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the importation into the United States of artificial intelligence or generative artificial intelligence technology or intellectual property developed or produced in the People’s Republic of China is prohibited.

Currently, China has the best open source models in text, video and music generation.

 

On Friday, TriStar Pictures released Here, a $50 million Robert Zemeckis-directed film that used real time generative AI face transformation techniques to portray actors Tom Hanks and Robin Wright across a 60-year span, marking one of Hollywood's first full-length features built around AI-powered visual effects.

Metaphysic developed the facial modification system by training custom machine-learning models on frames of Hanks' and Wright's previous films. This included a large dataset of facial movements, skin textures, and appearances under varied lighting conditions and camera angles. The resulting models can generate instant face transformations without the months of manual post-production work traditional CGI requires.

You couldn't have made this movie three years ago," Zemeckis told The New York Times in a detailed feature about the film. Traditional visual effects for this level of face modification would reportedly require hundreds of artists and a substantially larger budget closer to standard Marvel movie costs

Meanwhile, as we saw with the SAG-AFTRA union strike last year, Hollywood studios and unions continue to hotly debate AI's role in filmmaking. While the Screen Actors Guild and Writers Guild secured some AI limitations in recent contracts, many industry veterans see the technology as inevitable. "Everyone's nervous," Susan Sprung, CEO of the Producers Guild of America, told The New York Times. "And yet no one's quite sure what to be nervous about."

 

Meta's issue isn't with the still-being-finalized AI Act, but rather with how it can train models using data from European customers while complying with GDPR — the EU's existing data protection law.

  • Meta announced in May that it planned to use publicly available posts from Facebook and Instagram users to train future models. Meta said it sent more than 2 billion notifications to users in the EU, offering a means for opting out, with training set to begin in June.

  • Meta says it briefed EU regulators months in advance of that public announcement and received only minimal feedback, which it says it addressed.

  • In June — after announcing its plans publicly — Meta was ordered to pause the training on EU data. A couple weeks later it received dozens of questions from data privacy regulators from across the region.

 

A bipartisan group of senators introduced a new bill to make it easier to authenticate and detect artificial intelligence-generated content and protect journalists and artists from having their work gobbled up by AI models without their permission.

The Content Origin Protection and Integrity from Edited and Deepfaked Media Act (COPIED Act) would direct the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) to create standards and guidelines that help prove the origin of content and detect synthetic content, like through watermarking. It also directs the agency to create security measures to prevent tampering and requires AI tools for creative or journalistic content to let users attach information about their origin and prohibit that information from being removed. Under the bill, such content also could not be used to train AI models.

Content owners, including broadcasters, artists, and newspapers, could sue companies they believe used their materials without permission or tampered with authentication markers. State attorneys general and the Federal Trade Commission could also enforce the bill, which its backers say prohibits anyone from “removing, disabling, or tampering with content provenance information” outside of an exception for some security research purposes.

(A copy of the bill is in he article, here is the important part imo:

Prohibits the use of “covered content” (digital representations of copyrighted works) with content provenance to either train an AI- /algorithm-based system or create synthetic content without the express, informed consent and adherence to the terms of use of such content, including compensation)

view more: next ›