this post was submitted on 29 Aug 2026
344 points (98.3% liked)

memes

22494 readers
3144 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/Ads/AI SlopNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live. We also consider AI slop to be spam in this community and is subject to removal.

A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment

Sister communities

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 44 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] StillAlive@piefed.world 8 points 9 hours ago

Menthol too.

[–] tacosanonymous@mander.xyz 7 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Tobacco leaves are not good eats. Don’t do it.

[–] Jesus_666@lemmy.world 35 points 13 hours ago (3 children)

I don't think capsaicin is that much of an insecticide. AFAIK its primary purpose is to deter consumption by mammals since the seeds are more likely to survive if eaten by birds (who are immune to capsaicin).

Of course that makes it extra amusing that we're specifically after this stuff.

[–] gastroglizzy@piefed.social 14 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

But, because we like it so much, we cultivate it and protect it, ensuring its continued survival. In a way, the plant has domesticated us.

[–] petersr@lemmy.world 3 points 7 hours ago (1 children)
[–] gastroglizzy@piefed.social 1 points 46 minutes ago

We domesticated dogs. Cats domesticated us.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 29 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Plants: evolves to produce chemical that causes pain from consumption

Humans: evolves to become masochistic

[–] Nikki@lemmy.blahaj.zone 17 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

its impressive how much our species loves to evolve in order to ingest more toxins

[–] DrStanleyGoodspeed@lemmy.zip 8 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago)

It is truly funny if you take a step back and think about it like an alien would. It’s like when little monkeys that live near humans steal the booze sometimes or intentionally eat fermented fruit because they’re filthy little alcoholics. Fascinating little critters we are

[–] BlaestEgnen@feddit.dk 2 points 7 hours ago

It's not just humans, my dogs have always liked pickled jalapeños and a bit of chili

[–] DrStanleyGoodspeed@lemmy.zip 10 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Let’s not forget thc, morphine, and psilocybin

[–] TigerAce@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Coca, cacao.

Psilocybin isn't produced by plants but by fungi.

[–] DrStanleyGoodspeed@lemmy.zip 5 points 10 hours ago (2 children)

You’re right. Mushrooms aren’t plants. I stand corrected

[–] jama211@lemmy.world 6 points 7 hours ago

Knowledge is knowing they're not a plant. Wisdom is still putting them in the plant section in the grocery store.

[–] TigerAce@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago) (1 children)

Indeed they are not. They are their own category. Their cell structure is between plant cells and animal cells. A fungi cloud works similar to a brain. They are the things that make life possible. There are fungi living in our body which keeps us alive, we use them for bread, beer and penicillin among many other uses, they break down dead plants to create food for new plants, they divide food and communicate between trees, but they are themselves not plants. The largest living organism on earth is a fungi by the way.

[–] DrStanleyGoodspeed@lemmy.zip 3 points 10 hours ago (2 children)

I did not know that about the oldest living organism thing. where is this ancient fungi?

[–] TigerAce@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 9 hours ago

Largest, not oldest. In Oregon, between 2500 and 8500 years old. But fungi existed before plants did, 1.3 billion and plants 700 million years ago. So fungi are much older.

[–] PattyMcB@lemmy.world 1 points 10 hours ago (2 children)

Gone, but there used to be giant fungus "trees" called prototaxites

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prototaxites

[–] arctanthrope@lemmy.world 5 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago) (1 children)

there's actually new research saying prototaxites may not have been fungi, but belonged to an entirely separate kingdom that's now extinct. one of the defining characteristics of fungi are that their cell walls contain chitin, the same stuff that makes arthropod shells. prototaxites was found not to contain any chitin, while other ancient fungi of the same age as prototaxites already did, so it's not a feature of fungi that was adapted later. prototaxites was also found to contain microscopic structures that don't exist in any known fungus species

edit: damn, someone beat me to it while I was trying to find the details

[–] PattyMcB@lemmy.world -4 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah... be sure to read the replies first next time

[–] arctanthrope@lemmy.world 5 points 9 hours ago

the other reply didn't exist yet when I started writing mine. sorry that I took longer because I tried to provide more detail about the thing you seemed interested in

[–] in_my_honest_opinion@piefed.social 2 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago) (1 children)

From your link.

In 2026, research comparing fossils of a prototaxite species with other eukaryotic fossils in the same location found it to be structurally and chemically distinct, suggesting that Prototaxites is not a fungus and instead belongs to an extinct, previously undescribed kingdom of eukaryotic life.[1]

https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12822639/

[–] PattyMcB@lemmy.world 1 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago) (1 children)

Heh... learn something new every day

Edit: it sounds like it's a hot topic

It is widely considered a fungus, but the debate is ongoing.

[–] in_my_honest_opinion@piefed.social 3 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago) (1 children)

From the paper I linked, it's really interesting. They think it might be a giant eukaryote previously undefined.

We hypothesized that if P. taiti was a fungus, fossilization products resulting from the selective preservation or diagenetic alteration of glucan sugars would be present, derived from the original main composition of the cell walls including chitin (a polymer of N-acetyl glucosamine), or resulting from the recombination of glucan and protein into new melanoidin-like compounds, like those found in Fungi and arthropods in the Rhynie chert (39). To test this hypothesis, the previously assembled dataset of 47 samples, representing six higher taxonomic groups (39), was combined with 55 additional samples from these six groups and P. taiti (see the Supplementary Materials for full spectra for each sample, images of all sample spots, and details of taxonomic assignment). We then developed a novel analytic pipeline comprising two key steps: data exploration (step 1) and modelling (step 2) (fig. S3 and Supplementary Text Extended Methods). Step 1 aimed to show that biologically informative spectral bands correlated with taxonomic classification of specimens and that molecular fingerprints of organisms in the Rhynie chert retained information regarding their biological affinities, and to select the most relevant spectral features for further modelling. In step 2, we built classification models using supervised machine learning approaches to provide a robust statistical framework to accept or reject the taxonomic classification of each sample based on the selected spectral features.

[–] PattyMcB@lemmy.world 3 points 9 hours ago

Cool. I'll have to go back and read that tomorrow.

[–] arctanthrope@lemmy.world 17 points 13 hours ago (2 children)

don't forget cocaine and cannabinoids

[–] TigerAce@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Which both go well with cacao

[–] miked@piefed.social 1 points 11 hours ago

Now, you are talking my language.

[–] A_Union_of_Kobolds@lemmy.world 19 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

:absolutely drowning food in Sriracha: the spice must flow

[–] its_kim_love@lemmy.blahaj.zone 18 points 13 hours ago (2 children)

My friends look at me crazy when I add Sriracha to my food. It's not even that hot it's just good.

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 2 points 9 hours ago

My gut does not run without it

[–] wesker@lemmy.sdf.org 4 points 12 hours ago

Hell yeah, give me all 3.

[–] NathanRanch@lemmy.zip 3 points 12 hours ago

I watch the poopy show too

[–] ag10n@lemmy.world 2 points 11 hours ago
[–] loaf@sh.itjust.works 2 points 13 hours ago

Not me, drinking coffee, having some Lemon OG, and some nicotine.