jama211

Could have? Maybe. Likely would have? No.

Ah, aha, all good

Oh I read that ya dick, I just have more than one braincell so I can see that that's a slightly different point.

Indeed

Outrage is always louder than agreement. If 1% of people hate a thing, but they really hate it, there'll be 10 articles about how it's bad and one article about how it's good, because something being good doesn't get clicks. The people who find it useful or good or even are just fine with it just get on with their lives.

Yeah 100%, an agent failing at what I want it to do is extremely rare now, like, a 1% chance at most, and it's usually easily fixed. I think most people with this experience aren't developers at all in a professional sense and therefore don't have the oversight to write a prompt properly with well defined goals and scope, or they're using the free version or something.

The study methodology is also extremely dubious to boot. This is just getting clicks due to pure anti-ai sentiment. I have my own issues with AI too, but this is just classic internet clickbait.

This is a small, fairly biased survey with unpublished proper metrics. Whether you agree or disagree with the result, this is bad science.

I doubt it would've won anyway. There were loads of OS's at that time, most not having the issue of the US government intervening, and none of them won either.

I don't know what y'all are doing wrong but I never see AI on youtube. Starting with organic creators is the right way to go. Perhaps people who are experiencing this are browsing whilst not logged in? Algorithms have their downsides but mine knows I wouldn't want that

Yes buddy

It's almost like that's my point.

You turf the fascists out, then you work out a plan.

When your house is on fire, you gtfo. Worry about how you'll rebuild it afterwards.