this post was submitted on 26 Aug 2026
65 points (98.5% liked)

Technology

87598 readers
3694 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Eldritch@piefed.world 49 points 1 day ago

Is it Bambu? I bet it's bambu. Yep it's bambu who knew?

[–] DigDoug@lemmy.world 24 points 1 day ago (1 children)

As somebody who doesn't currently, and has never owned a Prusa printer - this sort of thing is why people pay a premium for Prusa printers.

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 day ago (4 children)

There are other, less expensive printers that are open source. I have no idea why people pay premiums for Prusa.

[–] greybeard@feddit.online 3 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago) (1 children)

I pay a premium for Prusa because I like their philospohy of making as much of it as possible in house, and their general openness, not just in code, but in how their business functions.

My first 3D printer was a Makerbot Thing-O-Matic. I'm very willing to spend if I think it will benefit the entire ecosystem I'm interested in.

Also, with Prusa, I get to feel like I'm DIYing it, but with great and detailed instructions, and an all-in-one parts sourcing. They are also great at supporting their devices after the fact, which is sometimes necessary, because they often come out a little too hot.

[–] semperverus@lemmy.world 1 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Doesn't Prusa rebrand OrcaSlicer though? How is that in-house? Why not just support OrcaSlicer and build their configs into it as a first-class citizen?

[–] greybeard@feddit.online 3 points 5 hours ago

Other way around. PrusaSlicer came first. It was originally a fork of Slic3r, then Bambu and OrcaSlicer forked it. Prusa certainly has back ported some features from OrcaSlicer, which is the way open source should work. Everybody wins.

[–] psycotica0@lemmy.ca 10 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

I paid a premium for a Prusa.

Their documentation and assembly instructions were phenomenal, the build quality has been solid, and from day one I've been having good prints and haven't yet had a print fail.

Maybe the other printers do that too these days, but I wanted a tool and not a project, at least in this case.

Beyond that I also just wanted to support a company with values I support, and have put a lot out into the world that other companies are piggy-backing off of. So yes, maybe another company can also put motors on a frame, but I felt like I was supporting something important when picking Prusa.

[–] HaraldvonBlauzahn@feddit.org 3 points 21 hours ago

That reminds me in the Apple II and its manual. An open system with the assembly code for the BIOS printed in the handbook.

[–] kata1yst@sh.itjust.works 16 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Personally, to support a European manufacturer with a massive track record of giving a fuck.

Their history of open source software, technically sound hardware, and excellent support is extremely impressive, even outside the lens of 3d printing these are rare and valuable traits.

[–] Batmorous@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Which open source ones would you recommend?