this post was submitted on 22 Aug 2026
258 points (97.4% liked)

Technology

87469 readers
3352 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Archive: [ https://archive.is/7MXMZ ]

all 35 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 10 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago)

I hope the glasses break on their face. But:

The two customers were, in fact, recording Hinkle, and the entire exchange was turned into content for social media.

...Can people not see this is the root problem?

These asswipes make a living being asswipes because Google, Meta, or Tiktok pay them to. Thats the root incentive. Most wouldnt risk all that trouble unless it was their living.


In other words, I dont want the moral of the story to be "this wouldnt happen without Meta glasses." The platform subsidizing those glasses is the ultimate problem.

[–] UndergroundParking@lemmy.cafe 5 points 14 hours ago

Started a new job last Monday. Was pleasantly surprised by them having already banned perv glass.

[–] mangobanana@discuss.online 4 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago) (1 children)

There is only ONE good thing the meta glasses are for and it's blind people. They are immensely useful to help the blind and low vision users to navigate the world. Other than that, they should not able to exist.

[–] chunes@lemmy.world 3 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago) (1 children)

As usual the disabled are the first to get hurt by all the bullshit people do. Guarantee one of these lemmy badasses who wants to run around hitting people is going to hit a blind person for just trying to get around.

[–] WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works 3 points 14 hours ago

let the downvotes rain but it does not matter who is uploading data to meta about its unconsenting environment.

[–] mangobanana@discuss.online 2 points 15 hours ago

I'll never understand why Google Glass were so offensive but these are just fine

[–] Hakuso@scribe.disroot.org 31 points 1 day ago

Meta is a menace.

Period.

Full stop.

[–] aarch0x40@piefed.social 23 points 1 day ago

Pervert glasses are also great for corporate espionage

[–] TIEPilot@lemmy.world 25 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

In my line of work you would be terminated on the spot if you wore these to work. I have sections of the facility that a fit bit would get you escorted off site and likely lose your job.

[–] imadethis@fedinsfw.app 12 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Lucky you. I literally get a camera pointed at my face for every hour I work, and it screams if it thinks I've lost focus. Hopefully our bosses would tell these cameras to get bent, but based on their little rich people concerns over how to pacify the 'lessers,' I'm not hopeful.

AI driver facing dashcam?

[–] deathbird@mander.xyz 17 points 1 day ago (1 children)

What if we punished crimes instead of monetizing them? We've had a multimedia Internet for a generation now, we could do this.

[–] WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works 1 points 14 hours ago

"but you don't have an expectation of privacy! no!! you don't have and you shouldn't!!!! 😡😥"

[–] HotsauceHurricane@lemmy.world 16 points 1 day ago (1 children)

My new go to is to stop the conversation, tell them to tell their glasses, out loud, to stop recording. If they dont then that conversation is over.
Period.

[–] WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works 3 points 14 hours ago

the problem is it was already recording you by that time

[–] cmnybo@discuss.tchncs.de 47 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Businesses need to start banning smart glasses with cameras or at least require the cameras to be covered with tape.

[–] thejml@sh.itjust.works 30 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I remember when you couldn't have camera phones a lot of business. Seems like these would be prohibited simply from a security standpoint. Harassment would just be another reason on top of that.

[–] Jason2357@lemmy.ca 3 points 14 hours ago

Yeah, literal camera pointed at computer screens, with a view of fingers on the keyboard, and who knows what apps installed with access. Anyone who does that should be fired as they are a danger to the organization.

[–] nobodysreadingthis@quokk.au 15 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

People need to start being more violent to gargoyles. You wear rayban, you risk getting popped without warning.

[–] Mediaburn@lemmy.zip 2 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

I'm so in for this. I am so tired and disgusted about how we let these influencers and content retards allow normal people to be turned into shitposts on the internet. If we started beating the hell out of these little shits a decade ago we woudnt have this problem. Luckely Ive never had anyone ever pull a camera on me in public. But I'm pretty sure I'd go to jail for whatever happens next.

[–] jdr@lemmy.ml 1 points 10 hours ago

Maybe you should just go to jail pre-emptively, if you can't control your violent urges.

[–] orbituary@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Love the Snow Crash reference. I use it a lot.

[–] benjirenji@slrpnk.net 2 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Many places already do this with cellphones. It shouldn't be different for such glasses. Using recording equipment is rarely appropriate in a workplace.

[–] WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works 1 points 14 hours ago

requiring it already even with phones? can I ask what kind of places is it?

[–] BassTurd@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago* (last edited 23 hours ago) (1 children)

I was chatting with our CEO the other day and the topic of recording glasses came up. He said they are band in the company, and they've had conversations with their lawyers, that also say not to allow them. I was happy to hear that.

[–] SalmiakDragon@feddit.nu 12 points 16 hours ago (1 children)
[–] admin@lemmy.my-box.dev 1 points 1 minute ago

I like the image of a parade of glasses marching down the marketing isle, playing all kinds of different instruments, much more pleasing.

[–] Hakuso@scribe.disroot.org 13 points 1 day ago (1 children)

There are legitimate uses for head mounted cameras that track your focus.

There are none for these devices that try to obfuscate their presence.

[–] Jason2357@lemmy.ca 1 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

I hate that I had to retire my Raybans to home use only. They look exactly like meta glasses.

[–] Hakuso@scribe.disroot.org 1 points 3 hours ago

Sucks to lose the investment, but better than being punched in the face for looking like a pervert.

Wonder if Rayban owners can sue them for their money back now that they're unwearable by anyone with sense.

[–] desmosthenes@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago
[–] Zarobi@aussie.zone 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

This was a very good, detailed read, including interviews with real affected people. I recommend anyone skimming the headline to read the full article.

[–] Komatoes@discuss.online 3 points 14 hours ago

Thanks, it was. And sad that in instances where the wearer could have been help accountable: Sprouts manager and comedy viewer, nothing was done.