this post was submitted on 17 Aug 2026
308 points (97.0% liked)

Technology

87685 readers
2699 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

At least one Kansas district is projecting $150,000 to $180,000 just to equip secondary students with individual phone lockers, according to the Wichita Eagle. The state provided zero dedicated funding. Every dollar comes from local budgets.

Districts choosing fabric locking pouches — think Yondr, the magnetic-lock system concert venues use to keep audiences present — face an estimated $30 per unit. Statewide, the Kansas Division of the Budget put that figure at roughly $13.4 million if every student received one, according to the Lawrence KS Times. Lockers require a steeper upfront investment. Neither option came with a state check attached.

Legislators passed the policy. The price tag was someone else’s problem.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 68 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (10 children)

It is long past time cell phones started to be regulated in schools. (And nationwide, but that'll never happen.)

BUT...

...what gets me is the money angle here. Can anyone out there help me understand why a temp-use cell phone locker is $180,000? To me, this just screams government malfeasance, and I'd bet someone involved in the passage of this bill either owns a company or took a bribe from the company that wants to sell $180,000 cell phone lockers that people are forced to buy.

[–] left_is_best@feddit.online 64 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Followed some links and did some googling. The school district in question is USD-261 in Haysville, Kansas. The high school should have about 1800 students, so they would need 67 of these cell phone lockers. The price for 6+ is $1510, but let's knock another $110 off since they're buying 11 times that many, so $1400. That's $93,800, for just the high school, and that's before we talk about where the hell you're going to put 67 of those things, and who you're going to pay to install them and do any necessary renovations to accommodate them.

[–] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 25 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I'm probably going to make a YT video on this later this week.

Do you mind if I use this info? Happy to credit you, just message me how you'd like it attributed and if you want me to shout anything out for you.

[–] left_is_best@feddit.online 31 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Go for it. I don't need any recognition or anything. A couple disclaimers:

1 - I'm not from the area in question, but I work in the public sector overseeing spending, so I thought it was an interesting exercise in understanding the scale we end up dealing with. So my comment is just a demonstration. None of this is actual information about the specific school district's plans. I'm assuming they must be getting their lockers even cheaper than the ones I found with a quick search, because with my numbers you're blowing past $180k pretty quickly once you scale it up to the whole district.

2 - I used this site for the student population. I didn't cross-reference it or anything, so I have no idea how accurate it is. It states 5788 total enrollment, with 31.2% at Campus High School, so that's where I got the 1800 students. It looks like the district serves multiple southwestern suburbs of Wichita, which makes a little more sense since the total population of Haysville itself is under 12k.

[–] Carmakazi@piefed.social 16 points 1 week ago

The 180k price tag seems to be for the outfitting of the school district and not just one school.

They say that Kansas City spent 150k and that's presumably one of the largest in the state.

[–] blueduck@piefed.social 12 points 1 week ago (3 children)

It’s also 180K for a 15-20 year refresh cycle. These are commercial units that are used in harsh environments… not a cabinet you buy once and it sits in your bedroom.

Add in wiring plus the install costs and $180K seems like a good deal

[–] Saffire@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 week ago

Wiring for what? It's a locker...

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] cloudshouter@lemmy.zip 32 points 1 week ago (1 children)

In totally unrelated news, there is a trend of students starting to use older phone models.

[–] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 20 points 1 week ago

Bring on the dumb phones, baby. Love it.

[–] DarrinBrunner@lemmy.world 30 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (4 children)

They could just leave them at home. I mean that worked just fine literally forever until these last two generations.

But, since both parents and kids are now addicted to the damn things, no one can imagine not having one in their hand for more than five minutes.

[–] Polisheocket@lemmy.zip 13 points 1 week ago (3 children)

That requires an honesty system and kids aren’t honest

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Diurnambule@jlai.lu 10 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Worked so well, let's avoid looking at the states of the world... Just install parental control and look the phone during their school time like a fucking responsible parent...

[–] Nalivai@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago (5 children)

Or better yet, teach your kid responsible usage and live them alone.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] DarkFuture@lemmy.world 25 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

I mean I've seen a lot more money wasted on much dumber shit.

Kids aren't going to learn if they've got handheld social media internet gaming consoles with them in school. I wouldn't have. They're not going to willingly put them away for hours every day. I wouldn't have. So.....lock the fuckers up. These kids need to be educated so I'm not being taken care of by drooling Idiocracy background actors when I'm in end-of-life care. There's way too much stupid going around already.

To be clear, 180k is too much. I'm just saying I agree with locking the goddamn things up.

[–] LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago (11 children)

"If you take your phone out you get detention." I don't see why this doesn't work anymore. Do parents have no control over their kids anymore? You get detention twice, 3rd time suspended, suspended twice 3rd time expelled. If I got suspended from school for taking my phone out my parents would have simply taken away the phone.

[–] DarkFuture@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago (5 children)

I don’t see why this doesn’t work anymore. Do parents have no control over their kids anymore?

I think you just answered your own question.

Clearly we've reached the stage of physically taking and locking their phones up during school hours because verbal threats weren't working. If parents had control of what their kids were doing when not in close proximity to them, this wouldn't be happening.

Lot of dumb adults out there these days. I think a lot of parents would be on the "but I need to contact them in case of emergencies" and "you're threatening my child's rights" boat if they just floated the idea of suspension for phone use. So now we're at the physically confiscate them upon entering like contraband stage.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (10 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] 0ops@piefed.zip 25 points 1 week ago (7 children)

6 digits? When I was in school the teachers tossed them in a cardboard box

[–] coralof@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago

I remember a math teacher I had in high school. There was this one girl at the front of the class that would not get off her RAZR flip phone and it was buzzing constantly while she was texting people.

He warned her that if she didn't put it away, he'd toss it out the window, and she could find it after school let out. She flipped him off and started texting again.

He took it and tossed it out the open window (on the first floor), into the grass. Then 20 minutes later it started raining. 😂

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] wedge@multiverse.soulism.net 17 points 1 week ago

They don’t want the next batshit stupid school shooting response to be so public.

[–] Ajen@sh.itjust.works 16 points 1 week ago (2 children)

How does this work, are all students required to put a phone in the locker? What about kids who can't afford a phone?

And what about kids who get a second phone to put in the locker so they can keep their main phone?

Suddenly all the kids have old flip phones to deposit into the Phone locker.

[–] Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 1 week ago (7 children)

What about kids who can't afford a phone?

No phone = Nothing to deposit

And what about kids who get a second phone to put in the locker so they can keep their main phone?

Get rekt. Rules for the poor.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] moendopi@lemmy.world 16 points 1 week ago (5 children)

I don't know if I am supposed to be angry about this or not. Someone tell me if I'm supposed to be angry!

[–] rumba@lemmy.zip 14 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Schools are scared to death of kids recording their staff being stupid, and each other. Legal liability/parental outrage. They block both phones and smart watches. If it were just a usage problem, they could have done what we always do and only take things away when they're an issue.

Since the advent of phones, this hasn't been a real problem.

My son's school collects them at the classroom door if they have them out, or ignores it if they're in their bag as long as they don't make noise. - free

Kansas, who is already horrible at maintaining educational budgets to a self-destructive degree wants to spend 150k of (likely unwilling) taxpayer money to provide fancy lockers for phones that could be solved by leave it in your bag and off, if we find it on or it makes noise, you get detention.

It's a stupid waste or resources and time.

if 0 is the Byrds Turn Turn Turn and 10 is RaTM bulls on parade, maybe go 6 or 7

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] AdolfSchmitler@lemmy.world 15 points 1 week ago

Sorry teachers there's just no room in the budget for raises. Oh and we're adding 10 more students to all of your classes too.

[–] wowwoweowza@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Bring two phones. Problem solved.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 12 points 1 week ago (3 children)

why not just have lockers or better yet use the already existing ones? phones have to stay home or in the locker?

[–] acosmichippo@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago (1 children)

it’s a question of how you choose to enforce the policy. locking up phones as each student enters the building guarantees close to 100% compliance and the rest of the day is undisturbed.

if they just tell students phones have to stay in lockers then teachers will constantly have to be on the lookout for phones and will never get close to 100% compliance.

[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 8 points 1 week ago

I don't see how there is a difference. do they have cell phone sensing technology and have somone take them and lock them up or do students lock them up as they enter. it makes no difference if they lock them up in their locker or a special cell phone place. either way some students will try and sneak around it.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 1 week ago (2 children)

The dumb thing about all this is, I was able to manage keeping my phone away just fine through high school. Hell, even kept it in my sock at one point so I’d know if I was getting a call (emergency situation) but it was still away and unused for the school day.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Bgugi@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (13 children)

It doesnt look like returning the devices has to be immediate or convenient. Heres my proposed plan:

Ban devices entirely. Any item discovered gets confiscated, labeled, and placed in a bin in the office (achieving the "secure" location requirement of the bill.) Students are permitted to label their item. Items are available for pickup weekly at the end of a district-wide midday "value of education" parental education session.

Labelmaker: ~$200/school

Labels: $0.01/item

2 hrs labor weekly: 38×2×$50=$3800/district/year

Value of inconveniencing parents enough to care: priceless.

load more comments (13 replies)
[–] Cornpop@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] defrostedLasagna4921@piefed.zip 8 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Public education is ruined. Glad I graduated before phones were banned.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] XLE@piefed.social 7 points 1 week ago

Broader than the name suggests, HB 2299 covers cellphones, tablets, smartwatches, wireless earbuds, PDAs, and text-messaging devices — basically everything in a teenager’s backpack except a pencil.

Not like students would have textbooks or calculators or notebooks.

[–] eleijeep@piefed.social 6 points 1 week ago

A thief would make more money stealing the lockers than the phones.

[–] DonutsRMeh@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Why not use existing lockers?

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›