this post was submitted on 24 Jun 2026
457 points (98.1% liked)

Technology

87598 readers
3967 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] x00z@lemmy.world -3 points 2 months ago (26 children)

They shouldn't subsidize it but they should at least sell it without profit.

The increase in price from 512GB to 2TB is more than what consumers would pay which shows they are profiting. It's even cheaper to get the 512GB version and buy a 2TB SSD yourself, plus you'd still have the 512GB drive for other things.

[–] Diurnambule@jlai.lu 10 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (11 children)

Employee need to be paid to build it, ship it. You are asking them to sell at loss. But okey.

[–] OozingPositron@feddit.cl -1 points 2 months ago (5 children)
[–] Diurnambule@jlai.lu 4 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)

I am, because I think every body have to get paid. And if you are considering corpo should give us money you don't understand corpo well enough, even the nicest corpo is still a corpo. Can't trust any company which isn't a cooperative, I seen corpo change leader and destroy their strong points often enough . And another guy made a good argument that it would be considering building a monopoly. Game seller which build a machine cheaper than any conccurence which can easily run it's store.

[–] OozingPositron@feddit.cl 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

"Sell it without profit" does not imply a loss, selling the product at the same cost of production does not provide any return of investment nor any losses.

[–] Diurnambule@jlai.lu 0 points 2 months ago

"Does not provide a return of investment" for capitalism corpo that a loss.

[–] x00z@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Well Sony sold the PS5 at a loss, so maybe we should stop their bullshit first. I just think Steam should play the game but draw the line at the cost instead of a loss.

[–] Diurnambule@jlai.lu 2 points 2 months ago

https://cyberpost.co/which-consoles-were-loss-leaders/ Not only Sony that a common occurrence in the console world. I am not aware of it happening before on PC Without monopoly lawsuits. (To be precise I mean that a game/software front selling hardware at loss to trap users)

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (21 replies)