this post was submitted on 29 Aug 2026
82 points (97.7% liked)

Technology

87685 readers
2684 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

As Musk’s SpaceX, Bezos’ Blue Origin, and other companies expand into space, they risk causing more problems for Earth in the process: air pollution, climate effects, and light pollution. The practice of downplaying these negative consequences while trumpeting the message that space operations can make life better on Earth has a new name: “starwashing,” a term the space researcher Melissa E. Yingling helped popularize in an article published in The Conversation earlier this month.

It’s a play on the term “greenwashing,” used to critique companies that highlight small sustainable investments to divert attention from the pollution their businesses cause. Space companies are appealing to a sense of “cosmic wonder” and making promises to benefit humankind, along with promoting their environmental bona fides, Yingling wrote.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] acosmichippo@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I think without him and tesla (especially the supercharger network), the EV market would be significantly behind where it is now. Granted that isn't anything to do with space, just answering your question as written.

[–] hellothere@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

And I do really, really, hate to give it to him, but starlink is genuinely impressive.

[–] CosmoNova@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

The biggest problem with Starlink is that most people who have it should really have access to fiber. Starlink just really exposes the shortcomings of our terribly handled infrastructure. Of course satellite internet servers other purposes too but it really annoys me how otherwise fairly developed places have so shitty internet that they need freaking satellite to get a more reliable connection. It would be far cheaper for everyone to just massively expand fiber like everywhere in the European Union for example.

Of course there are also the SpaceX launch sites that devastate communities and environments in ways that are absolutely unacceptable but I digress.

[–] Jolteon@lemmy.zip 1 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

The population density of the majority of the European Union is multiple orders of magnitude higher than it is in most of the places that Starlink is especially popular, like Australia.

The cost per customer of installing fiber in those places is extraordinarily high.

[–] hellothere@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 day ago

Oh absolutely, I completely agree that it shouldn't be needed, but until alternatives are built, it serves a purpose.