this post was submitted on 28 Aug 2026
416 points (97.7% liked)

Technology

87627 readers
4149 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] frongt@lemmy.zip 10 points 21 hours ago (10 children)

How much data do you have, and are the drives identical? Usually I do in-place conversions by taking some drives offline, creating a degraded raid on them, migrating the data, then wiping the remaining drives and bringing them online in the new raid.

Works for zfs pools too, but you can't create a pool with missing drives, you have to create a temporary block device then mark it offline, then replace it with the real drive once it's free.

[–] ThePantser@sh.itjust.works 8 points 20 hours ago (9 children)

Heh wow its been awhile since I checked my storage. Lol I forgot I added a bunch last year. Its actually at 116TB now with 13 free.

[–] theherk@lemmy.world 9 points 20 hours ago (7 children)

Wow! I thought my NAS was loaded, but good lord. What are you storing?

[–] ThePantser@sh.itjust.works 11 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago) (1 children)

Linux ISOs 🏴‍☠️

I run my family's Streaming Service.

[–] theherk@lemmy.world 5 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Me too, but my library must not be nearly as impressive.

[–] RogueBanana@piefed.zip 8 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Some of the more high quality 4k releases (even 1080p ones) just gobbles up storage. I had to settle for the more optimized releases since I just have a 8tb external drive. Wanted to build a nas but man they are expensive, both a good nas and even the basic hard disks. Can't wait for the bubble to pop.

[–] schipelblorp@sh.itjust.works 3 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago) (2 children)

Some of the more high quality 4k releases (even 1080p ones) just gobbles up storage.

I'm scratching my head here. Are they just being sloppy and inconsiderate?

The biggest video file I have is a fan edit of the hobbit trilogy. It's 4 hours of 720p at 8 gigabytes. Why?

I'm just starting to experiment with Jellyfin, and I'm considering shrinking that down. I'm good with whatever format fit 90 minutes onto a 700MB video file that could be burned to a CD.

[–] village604@adultswim.fan 2 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

Raw bluray rips can easily be over 100GB. I tried for a minute before I decided 1080p was sufficient.

[–] RogueBanana@piefed.zip 7 points 16 hours ago

Compression will almost always compromises on quality. You can often notice the artifacts on scenes with lot of moving particles and such. So if you can afford the extra storage then that would definitely be the better option. At what stage do you consider them good enough is a very personal choice and the difference in quality often diminishes a lot as you go up. If you are happy with smaller releases then that's perfectly fine too.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)