this post was submitted on 26 Aug 2026
290 points (94.2% liked)

memes

22472 readers
4034 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/Ads/AI SlopNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live. We also consider AI slop to be spam in this community and is subject to removal.

A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment

Sister communities

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

…except the local bird population.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] bryophile@lemmy.zip -5 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago) (4 children)

And feed them sustainable, vegetarian food?

Edit: I see the word "local" was added before "environment" later... To be clear, I'm not advocating keeping cats inside and feeding them vegan food. I was just stating their food has a significant impact on the environment, also if you keep them indoors.

[–] village604@adultswim.fan 9 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Cats are obligate carnivores. Feeding them vegetarian food is literally animal cruelty.

[–] bryophile@lemmy.zip 2 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Then there is no animal friendly way to keep cats without damage to the environment

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 1 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago) (1 children)

Oh so I guess if we cannot be perfect we should just stop caring. Blocking people who cannot be communicated with on here requires way too much effort and yet I persist...

Like what the fuck is the point in pretending people need to know that nothing is perfect? Everyone obviously already gets that

You're implying something and it's not good. Pretend otherwise all you want, I won't see your messages

[–] bryophile@lemmy.zip 0 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago) (1 children)

I'm implying cats have an effect on the climate because they eat meat. Not telling anyone not to have cats. I'm not sneakily implying anything else. I'm also not saying anything remotely controversial.

[–] Natanael@infosec.pub 2 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

I get that there's a difference with farmed meat and all, but you may as well argue natural wild predators are bad for the environment

[–] bryophile@lemmy.zip -1 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

The difference between farmed and wild meat is crucial so no I may not as well argue that.

[–] Smif_N_Lenin@piefed.social 2 points 11 hours ago

Leaving cats to find their own game instead of feeding them farmed meat is significantly worse for the local population (of birds in particular)

[–] atomicbocks@sh.itjust.works 2 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Then you might as well off yourself too because there’s no way for you to keep living without destroying the environment either… And don’t tell me that you can do it by eating sustainable vegetarian food because we both know that you live somewhere and you clearly have some piece of technology capable connecting to the Internet so you’re just as guilty of environmental destruction is my cat is.

[–] bryophile@lemmy.zip -1 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago) (1 children)

No, the difference is that cats are kept as a fun companion. It's a choice. The choice of killing yourself is a bit different I'd say. That's a false comparison.

I'm not advocating for anyone to have or not have cats because of the environment. There's no problem with any single individual cat, just like there is no problem with an individual owning a car. It is every household having one that is causing problems. But no one is going to forbid a certain individual from owning a car, neither am I judging anyone for owning a cat.

For a choice of having a pet it's worth considering the effect on the environment I'd say. Albeit on a different level than whether one should consider killing him- or herself.

And again, I'm merely replying to a statement made above. I'm not telling anyone what to do.

[–] atomicbocks@sh.itjust.works 3 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Look, you’re being an ass and I wish that you would just admit that you’re being an ass. My cat eats in a week what I eat in a meal. There is no comparison and unless you are actually saying that cats should be euthanized then there is no fucking choice but to keep them either.

[–] bryophile@lemmy.zip -2 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

No you only had the choice before you got the cat, I agree it's a bit late to kill it now.

But also: I'm not even telling you to kill your cat, that's your doing.

[–] atomicbocks@sh.itjust.works 4 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

The cat showed up under my shed… My choices were take the cat to a euthanizing shelter or keep the cat. Seriously stop being a dumbass.

[–] bryophile@lemmy.zip -4 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago)

Your specific cat being a rescue says nothing about the significant environmental impact of pet food production

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 0 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

their food has a significant impact on the environment

What is anyone supposed to do with that information? Ie what is your point?

[–] bryophile@lemmy.zip -2 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

The point is keeping them inside doesn't prevent damage to the environment, as a reply to what is said above. Is that not how this works?

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 3 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago)

But it does prevent huge amounts of environmental damage which can be helped, while we cannot help that cats require food. The only thing we could do about that is farm chickens for them or something.