this post was submitted on 21 Aug 2026
373 points (99.0% liked)

Technology

87417 readers
3849 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Jhex@lemmy.world 6 points 11 hours ago (3 children)

Exploding spectacularly in Delta's face in 3, 2, 1...

[–] GalacticRobot@lemmy.world 3 points 5 hours ago

They already have been doing it, and it's just an extension of what every airline has done since de-regulation, just more granular. If anything, this will make them more money, especially when they already aren't profitable as an airline, they are profitable because they act as a bank.

[–] tempest@lemmy.ca 10 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

It won't, you can already see this happening in tons of industries and markets.

The glorious k shape economy means the middle of rapidly shrinking and all the money to be made is at the extremes of the spectrum. You can already see tons of brands increasing prices or pivoting away from non "luxury" offerings.

Soon there will only be Emirates and RyanAir and Delta doesn't want to be RyanAir.

[–] PartyAt15thAndSummit@lemmy.zip 2 points 6 hours ago

In B2B, individual pricing is common indeed, but in B2C? I would have thought it's illegal, but it probably depends on the legal area in which you reside, I guess.

[–] daychilde@lemmy.world 6 points 11 hours ago (2 children)

Is it? Don't the websites already look at if you've visited before and other things to offer different pricing? And people have griped about it but has anything been done?

It should explode, I just don't think it is or will.

[–] DuncanTheDrunk@lemmy.world 8 points 10 hours ago (2 children)

It'd be nice if there was some type of regulation to prevent all this "dynamic pricing" bullshit. Instead I'm just waiting for it to hit grocery stores, because why not.

[–] daychilde@lemmy.world 1 points 9 hours ago

It might can hit online shopping, but it is not practical to hit stores - at least not with the recent scares and rumours of some stores trying to do on-shelf dynamic pricing.

[–] Jhex@lemmy.world 0 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago)

how could that ever happen when Americans seem to be preconditioned to get fucked and just shrug about it?

[–] Jhex@lemmy.world -1 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

first, I trust a regular algorithm to deliver predictable results, not so much ai

second, I was expecting at least some public push back but given the answres here, it looks like nobody knows what pushback means

so lesson learnt for me and I guess enjoy your higher prices for absolutely no gain as a consumer

[–] daychilde@lemmy.world 1 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

I don't fly.

But given my last sentence, not sure i'm the best target for your angst, which with I might not share the emotion, but I share the conclusion. lol. But no worries if you did see and still felt I was the best place to reply.

[–] Jhex@lemmy.world -1 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

well I had no way to know you don't fly… all I saw was your casual dismissal of this more efficient gouging

[–] daychilde@lemmy.world 0 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

casual dismissal

Ah, so you can't read. Got it.

[–] Jhex@lemmy.world -1 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

It should explode, I just don't think it is or will.

and English is not even my first language

[–] daychilde@lemmy.world 0 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

I don't see how supporting that it should explode in their faces (from the comment to which I'd replied) indicates casual dismissal.

But I guess you're just smarter than me.