this post was submitted on 16 Aug 2026
1039 points (98.8% liked)

Technology

87450 readers
3512 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Eheran@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

If you train an AI to do it, I am sure it would completely destroy nature. It would find "bugs" like getting on an aircraft to reach new areas, teamwork to destroy any enemy etc.

[–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I'm sure it wouldn't. Prove it, you're wrong. Existing bugs already do that stuff better. And "if you train it" is doing a lot of heavy lifting, since actual bugs can handle novel situations.

[–] Eheran@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Have you never wondered how some animal would completely take over if it was just a bit smarter? Example: A single fox can kill dozens of chicken. Imagine the chicken working together and attacking it, picking out the eyes etc. instead of literally not defending at all.

Or a herd of cow or whatever herd animal that could easily team up and trample/stomp/crush/... a predator but instead they all just run away and the slowest is dead.

[–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 1 points 21 hours ago

Smarter is expensive! The brain will use more calories and cost more. LLMs are drastically less energy-efficient than natural brains. We're one of the few cases where spending more on compute was worth it.

You're describing eusociality, not intelligence. One might argue that ants have completely taken over, but they aren't necessarily smarter than solitary wasps. LLMs only exist because of a huge economy behind them, and it remains to be seen how widespread they'll be once they're expected to generate a profit.