Amateur. I've been on for 6.5 months and have nearly 6000 comments.
What the hell is a tesseract list?
wonderingwanderer
joined 8 months ago
Aren't situations like that precisely what the second amendment is for?
In a sane world, the company you sue would have to pay your legal expenses in addition to the compensation they owe you...
There must be thistle seed in the mix you use.
You can also buy exclusively thistle seed specifically for finches
The decoy container could be literally anything. Sure good steganography would be hidden in something that looks real, like a jpeg or a music file, because it gives it a reason for existing at a glance. That's not to say it couldn't be a blank plaintext file, it just might arouse more suspicions and be subjected to more scrutiny
Self-aware moths
Every civilization ever has been self-centered, so honestly I'm not that torn up about it. Europe is more globally/internationally-focused than most of the world.
Why do you think it hosts the UN headquarters, ICC headquarters, and so many other IGO headquarters? It's the only multi-national federation that I know of and is part of the largest and most widespread defense pact in the world.
Clearly people want to live there, otherwise they'd be migrating to BRICS nations and Northern Africa. So it must be doing something right.
What's wrong with a civilization being self-centered? Especially when most of the critique it's received regarding previous centuries was that it was too expansionist?
Good to know, thanks. Yeah, kamelüsü wouldn't sound right now that you mention it. But brör sounds the same as brør, and skändes sounds the same as skændes.
Again, I've never studied Swedish. I'm just basing this off the pronunciations in German and Danish, which I know aren't perfect analogues, but it seems to generally make sense
Swedish, no?
Or do they use Ö instead of Ø? I noticed Ä tends to replace the Æ in other Skandinavisk languages. I'm guessing Ü replaces Å? (I've never studied Swedish)
I didn't realize Europe was its own galaxy
Did they really think people would be okay with being automatically opted in for a feature that would allow other people to generate AI content of them (without notifying said person, at that)?
My mom did that shit and I'm still pissed off. I didn't give her permission to feed my family to the AI machine to produce uncanny valley pictures of us
What's permissible in every relationship is different and I understand why that could be a real violation of trust. Of course, in general and barring some narrow exceptions, none of us have the authority to tell others what they may do with images of us.
Why does this read like slop generated to defend corporate violation of personal rights?
no ur slop
you say "corporate violation of personal rights" i say "basic journalism" agree to disagree
I dunno, you tell me 🙄 we're literally talking about a built-in deepfake feature and you're defending it by calling it basic journalism instead of corporate violation of personal rights.
How is that the same as calling deepfakes "basic journalism"? How is it different?
Swedish doesn't have the ø or the æ, it uses ö and ä instead.
The only one it shares with the other skandinavisk languages is å.
That being said, nice reference.