wizardbeard

joined 3 years ago
[–] wizardbeard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 1 month ago

pidgin

God how I miss interoperability. I went to college right as all the disparate chat systems started coalescing into everyone just using Facebook, and it was super useful being able to chat across all the platforms (including FB) from one program

[–] wizardbeard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 44 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (3 children)

I get that per Wikipedia, the source of these is:

In the Spring 2003 issue of the secular humanist magazine Free Inquiry, Laurence W. Britt, who is described as "a retired international businessperson, writer, and commentator" published "Fascism Anyone?", which included a list of 14 defining characteristics of fascism.

But you have to get that a random unsourced image of white text on a black background is some real "trust me bro" Facebook shares from Grandma type shit.

Getting tired of "it's okay when our side does it because we're right, but we'll clown on it when the bad people do it because they're wrong". Just be better.

And while I'm complaining, the source of these is a fucking editorial by someone with no actual credentials or qualifications to declare this shit. Now it's being passed around online like it's certifiable fact because it sounds accurate.

All of those are problems. All of those are bad. What is happening in the USA is bad. But muddying the waters by taking random bullshit like this as certified fucking fact only makes talking about shit harder, as everyone has their own set of things they think are truth, most of which have been latched on to for no reason more than "it sounds right and reinforced my beliefs".

Grumble grumble grumble

Parody image of the 14 Defining Characteristics of Fascism

[–] wizardbeard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 months ago

It helped that there were used and rental markets for relatively "modern" titles that are now almost entirely non-existent.

[–] wizardbeard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 22 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (4 children)

You worked places with style guides? Did... Did you have a real testing environment that wasn't prod too?

I got taken off a project recently for being too direct about how the rest of the team was just spray and praying entirely AI generated code with no standards or review whatsoever, and they were charging ahead like it was a race to implement features we hadn't even discussed if we wanted/needed.

If you can't tell me how it works, you can't confirm that we actually need it, you can't tell me the upstream and downstream effects (or confirm they don't exist), and you can't even confirm that we even want it to do the thing it only supposedly does, then we have better things to do than go on a wild goose chase trying to debug it when there's a looming deadline for things that legitimately do not work that we need. Stop vibe coding and actually review the existing shit for fucks sake. If the requirements have never been clear, solve that instead of generating more slop. Maybe update some of the existing documentation instead of having AI wholesale hallucinate entirely new not quite right ones over and over.

Anyway, please tell me more happy development bedtime stories. I need to chase away the nightmares.

view more: ‹ prev next ›