That is definitely the issue. And this problem is only ramping up in almost all fields.
webghost0101
joined 3 years ago
Were not meant to feel sorry for this person.
This is not an emotion triggering article. Its a n information warning.
The apps some use to send private messages can call the cops on you if an ai gets context wrong. Kinda a big deal.
We have been the steampunk universe all along!
The question i have,
The image is digital when it is uploaded. There is a fixed assortiment of pixels only differentiated by the contrast of shades of grey.
The instructions say to colorise.
In my head this means every pixel needs to obtain a color value, while still matching contrast with pixels around it.
What ai does instead is provide an entirely newly constructed image made up from entirely new pixels which show “google deepdream” patterns.
This is from the final result where the author was “happier” with the result and asked what i assume is an llm to not invent information that isn’t there. (Zoom in)
This is not what i would call a colorisation, it’s a colorised re-creation. I imagine a real colorisation as simply a layer of color values that combine with the exact pixels of the digital scan. Disabling that layer (using photo software) should return the exact digital original and turning the final colorisation into a black and white filter should still leave it nearly identical to the original. Anything else is a recreation for fun and fantasy purposes only.
To vent, i am so glad we convinced someone in the family not to use the “ai enhanced” version for a loved ones official funeral picture.
I took it as a non serious joke riffing of a common meme.
The message isn’t but
“US Law Enforcement terrorise and kill innocent civilian(s)” sadly is.
I am sorry but It actually kinda looks to me like an ai generated advertisement for this persons book. The adapted from makes me think its not the original text which genuinely feels uncanny and convoluted like ai does.
Are we sure this person is directly involved or was ai generated self authored articles part of the small print of a advertisement contract.
Or are we sure that their qualifications make them really immune to make use of ai like this.
Best use of this template i’ve seen.
Its not that i care personally but its nice to know i am legally protected and my library isn’t going to care with how often we come lend new a new stack.
My library is still lending cd dvd and blueray…
And i am still ripping them all to use on a digital consumer device thanks to a specific local law that ruled people who own an mp3 player can rip cds from libraries to listen on the go.
No no , thats just standard operation. As long as the “owner” and shareholders ends up with more money than they started they do not give a fuck.
view more: next ›
Not sure what the context is to warrant this reaction. I am not part of the anti-everything-ai mob.
I fully agree on both points. Llms are here to stay and people need to learn to use them.
That said: “please check the output before you hand it out” seems like such a basic minimum.
i am actually shocked that usually smart people, including school teachers. Don’t practice this minimum of quality control.
But this wasn’t a teacher, this was “the administration” a plural of people of which any could and should have done this minimum.
At that point just hand out empty notebook instead. Its would actually be useable. It would be way less damaging to the image of the school. A School that cant write legible text in officials documents isn’t worth sending my kids too.