Does no one else notice that both of these responses point out that how the recipient feels makes a difference? They're addressing the unfortunately most common experience, but also including that how you feel or if you're okay with it is important.
As for the "bias" being presented here, there's nothing wrong with responding to unequal things unequally. Women are far more likely to experience unwanted touching and that's just the sad reality.
There is absolutely nothing in the article to indicate the family's political leanings or how they voted.
Reject team-based multiplayer. Play a fighting game!
I stopped buying Campbell's or any of its subsidiary brands a few years ago when they both raised prices and reduced the size of the can.
They were underhanded about it too because they made the cans slightly taller so it wasn't obvious that they had less volume.
I agree that 12 years isn't "long past" the lifespan if a computer, but that's also an aggressive and very implausible worst case scenario.
They said "a cool design" and nothing at all about any logo or intellectual property. Maybe it's a sick dragon playing a guitar.
At least most responses seem to be pushing back on OP's implication that this is some kind of double standard.