tomalley8342

Yea I said it's a statistical guess... it's the very first sentence I wrote...

Yea it's a statistical guess. The statistics are weighted in a certain direction for me seeing how many times this person seems to be caught up in the same accusation and all of his profile link websites looking... the way it does. But of course it could just be that he happens to write a lot like how AI would generate text.

I don't think @eicker put all that much thought into that comment lol

i question if the author even has open source projects.

Yeah you can see for yourself here: https://tty.fail/mrus

I mean it would be weird if he talked about migrating his projects off of codeberg if he didn't have any projects to migrate.

If that's what you want man 😅. I think it's a stupid thing to ask but it should be up to you.

What the hell is a “typical AI bro”

I would certainly and accurately use this label for the kind people parroting the same "too difficult" excuse as AI lobby groups for one.

Have they (or you) considered that if it's too difficult to do in a way that respects the consent of the people you're taking from, maybe you shouldn't do it? (Rhetorical question of course, I know you already gave such excuses as "the cat's out of the bag", etc).

Why would literally anyone care?

Clearly the many creators of the work they're taking from care. Do you only respect consent when you happen to agree with their world view?

I got that much. I'm not sure why you were asking whether I was being facetious or not considering that I initially (and correctly) clocked you as not giving a shit about such consent. And going back to the original post, you really don't seem any different from your typical ai bro in your careless attitude towards the art/textbooks/family photos your ai models guzzle up during traning. Why pretend otherwise?

It's the same completely reasonable standards we hold for everybody else? I am just as curious as you are. Does the fact that "'not guzzling all the information and media from people who specifically don't want them to' is such a difficult and infeasible proposition that they can't possibly honor it" not set off any alarm bells for you? morally?

Yeah, I already got the impression that you didn't give a shit about the consent side from your earlier posts.

Yes, courses and materials coming with terms and conditions for its use is not really a new concept for most reasonable people.

Specifically related to the posted picture, the regular firefox mobile (and desktop) can be configured to not show your history inside of your search/address field, so that you can have your history without it being discoverable to unintentional inspection.

the shared culmination of all human knowledge

A good amount without their consent yeah. You tried to justify it earlier in the comment chain by saying it's not an exact reproduction and that the cat's already out of the bag, which is what ai bros typically say to cope with that aspect.