I'm pretty sure that a robot on wheels can open a door as easily as a robot on legs.
technocrit
There's no reason that violent control needs to take a humanoid shape.
The empire can control people by murdering them with drones much more easily than murdering with "humanoids".
What advantage does a humanoid robot have over drones?
Another revenue stream for the grift economy.
Or maybe stop threatening and invading the other side of the planet? Pursue mutually beneficial research and trade instead?
I'm sure USA can do it. \s \s \s
No. The military already has drones that are far cheaper and faster than these pointless clunkers.
Cool fantasy if you're a billionaire. The rest of us are dying in that "dense forest". jfc.
I just want health care. I don't give a shit about these dumb clunkers and their imaginary heroics.
You have no concern for the future of humanity, do you?
Maybe there are better things to waste resources on than pointless clunker that nobody wants or needs.
Even if computerized chess were some kind of major achievement (it's not), it wasn't the massive waste of energy, resources, and hype that this nonsense is.
Basically we should not be siding with the unethical side of IP law just to oppose AI corporations.
Why not? There is nothing ethical under capitalism. The system is literally destroying the planet. Normal people need to use whatever tools they can just to have a chance.
Aaron Swartz was ~~prosecuted~~ murdered for scraping, while Meta does it without consequence
This user has been posting on Lemmy for decares?
lowest-carbon
Ok, now do nuclear waste.
"Against" Taiwan... Or "for" Taiwan... Probably both since neither empire really gives a shit about the Taiwanese.