sukhmel

Yeah, everyone is outraged at being a product when using free services, but then also outraged at paid ones.

I'm a bit suspicious of how they want to implement scoring, I feel like it's either going to be gamed by users or rigged by owners, but otherwise it looks fine as an idea and as a replacement for xitter

Maybe it was some kind of sarcastic jab, but I don't really understand the point either

Or the pigeon can be the drone itself, what a wonderful world it is

I don't get the connection, could you elaborate?

I like his art, and have been reading his comics before AI flood, but one thing I find very annoying now that I didn't notice before: AI slop tends to draw characters staring intently at nothing, completely missing an object they are supposed to look at, so now it irks me whenever I see that even if it's a human made art. Edit: and to be fair, here the character looks at a parrot instead of painting, which is valid but feels off at a first glance, maybe I just need to go touch some dry grass left. end edit

Same thing to a lesser extent for when a character does an action like chopping a PC monitor with an axe, but it looks like a slap instead, which I also have seen made by humans. I get it, action poses are hard, it's just now I'm more sensitive to those because of all the slop 😩

Frankly, it looks like nobody making decisions is doing that based on numbers anymore, and if that's a case, it is definitely happening based on vibes.

Or not, if something new and shiny captures their attention before that.

That makes sense, but this might also take a long time

Sounds like fun!

— legal department

Their point was that Blizzard should've hired DotA devs to make it made by Blizzard

Only gambling on thermal noise is the real deal /½s

risks were calculated

@

but I am bad at math

Until some bots start doing that to look like real persons