solrize

joined 3 years ago
[–] solrize@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

One can support a social media age ban (similar to the porn age bans that have existed since forever) while opposing the implementation proposal (invasive age verification needed for nearly everything).

From what I can tell, the definition of social media in the ban proposals amounts to the presence of algorithmic amplification of clickbait and outrage. It's not too big a stretch to support banning that altogether, not just for minors. Traditional forums would still be fine, and Lemmy would be fine if it changed a few features that are arguably bad anyway.

[–] solrize@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Yeah trouble is those use a lot of power, from what I heard. I'm satisfied with a usable e-reader that can flip pages at tolerable speed.

[–] solrize@lemmy.ml 9 points 2 months ago

Fear and surprise, no prob. Ruthless efficiency = pushback. Fanatical devotion to the Pope -- WATCH OUT BRO.

[–] solrize@lemmy.ml 14 points 2 months ago (4 children)

Was $500 now $400 still lol.

[–] solrize@lemmy.ml 18 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Good luck with that, how about a star trek replicator while you're at it.

view more: ‹ prev next ›