scrubbles

Seriously Chinese models and chips right now are because the sudden bargoes told them they couldn't keep relying on us tech. The us has been doing an exceptional job at convincing governments and people that they should not be dependent on the US, as we apparently will rugpull at any moment.

The fact that we weren't told how much he "profited" is very telling to me. Guaranteed its not more than a few thousand. They need to make an example if him though, throwing him in jail with murderers and rapists so he learns his lesson of not creating mix CDs. This is probably the most corrupt thing I've seen happen to non violent ceiminal. Should have been community service and a fine.

It's obvious that to them "line must go up", and that having a game be successful is not enough money anymore.

Dragon Age 4 was the obvious item for me for EA. Here was a game that had fans frothing at the mouth. DA3 (Inquisition) was very good, and while the story wrapped up well, there was a huge cliffhanger at the end that always left us wondering. It's story was written years earlier in 2007 with DA:Origins. Now, nearly 20 years later, finally the stunning conclusion.

Except EA decided that that wasn't enough. It had to be bigger. It had to attract not just RPG gamers, not just fans of the series, for those are small potatoes. They needed every gamer on the planet to play this game. So they changed the story to make it more "appealing" to a "broader audience", which of course means they watered it down and didn't make it too scary for any specific group. They removed all real stakes, and removed all actual connection. It was written with Marketing and HR in the room, dictating that you can't say this or that, and it ended up being the most bland and soulless game in the entire series. ( While it did resolve all the plotlines, you found yourself playing to figure out the ending, not because you were enjoying it. By making a game for everyone, they made a game for noone.

Seriously, you could not piss off your companion. You could destroy their personal world, and they would at most sad face for the next conversation. In DA:O your company would literally walk away from you and try to take you kill you later, but in 4, just pouty face and then back to "You're the bestest boss ever!"

So this is just so obviously corporate overreacting. "We made a game for everyone and no one bought it!". So do they go back, think about what happened? Do they realize what they did wrong and pivot so that they can come back stronger with a true heartfelt story-rich game? Of course not. It needs ads now.

DA is just one of EA's hundreds of properties of course, but it's such a telling story for me. Inquisition literally gave me goosebumps, it made me tear up, I felt connected with the game. I rooted for the characters, I became friends with them. DA4s characters were all straight up like I was having a meeting with my HR representative.

Rinse and repeat for Mass Effect 5 now, and their shock that Andromeda didn't do well.

Never thought we'd be rooting on Big Porn to help save integrity of the internet, but I'm all for it. They brought us HD, 4K, VR, now let's go save the rest.

No, Ariana is beyond opinion. You can literally count her ribs. I literally cringe every time I see her. It's beyond attractive or unattractive, she simply is not healthy.

I worked in ads only a few months and learned how fucked that industry was. They're basically given license to just run scripts in your browser, sucking as much info as they can. The fact that it hasn't been regulated to hell is shocking, and truly a failure of all leaders.

Some weird sexist crap. My spouse and I have always split everything, in fact I was in college while she was already working, and paid for me most of the time. Generalizing like this only solidifies your own personal prejudices.

Comment is over a year old dude.

To me, that's even less of a reason. They could still see in, she could still see them, I side with the city still. What was the point of moving it except wasting taxpayer money?

I'm forced to give it the worst possible reading because we don't have the other side. Personally, I read this as some HOA type who can't be bothered to have a few people milling around while waiting for the bus.

We have no knowledge of why it was there in the first place, we're only given one side of the story. Maybe this was closer to a crosswalk, or nextdoor was less safe. We don't even know if the stop existed there before she moved in. We don't know. All we know is old lady didn't like view of people outside her window and decided that instead of dealing with it she had to change it herself.

Yeah screw the public, she deserves her view