It also said that “the chemicals may present an ‘unreasonable risk’ to workers and the public.”
Dear god, don't put me in the position where ibhave to defend the EPA, please.
"It is said" is a horrible argument. Come with facts or go away. They don't even knoenwhich chemicals exactly will be used, so how about you start there?
Gates is an irresponsible narcissistic asshole bit he's right here. Not that its hard yo be right here, its a very obvious observation
Economics has basically come down to "make ridiculous claims and as long as you claim it, mi ey will flow"
They also still use cheques in 2026 though
And again a small tax over the insane profits they reaped on all this
They knew what they were doing, they knew the harm, why aren't the c suite in jail by now?
After it became a scandal
we're not sorrybthat er did this, or allowed it to happen, we're sorry we're caught
Thats what monopolies all do eventually
Don't do that
I get the point, but that will instantly destroy someone's life and land you justifiably in jail for a very long time
If you have a job in a school that has the word "officer" in it, you're already doing school wrong
Australia's peak regulator of medical practitioners, AHPRA, said clinicians must always check all output from an AI scribe for accuracy to ensure they meet their professional obligations.
Show me one single AI user that checks the output of their AI, and I will show you my unicorn
Which is fraud. Again. Not that anything will happen about that
Paid messages like these, trying to sway public opinion with ads paid for by companies, should be a criminal offense but instead we're "meh" about it.
Supported and yes, please.
I've heard these encryption backdoor proposals come back every year or two for over the past 2 decades