notfromhere

joined 3 years ago
[–] notfromhere@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 day ago

Video doesn’t show what lead up to it, so how are you basing that opinion?

[–] notfromhere@lemmy.ml -2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

Fuck Elon and all that, but don’t let your hatred blind you to the tech and the problem of autonomous vehicles. Isn’t this the technology community?

I also didn’t say it wasn’t the cars fault. I said we need to see what lead up to this because it’s really hard to tell what the actual issue is.

[–] notfromhere@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 weeks ago

I didn’t saw it was dangerous only that it was similar to MS GDID, and it is.

[–] notfromhere@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

I’m not technically inclined enough to harden against that, nor do ai really have the inclination. But here is a thread on that topic where I even heard about it.

!privacy@lemmy.ml

https://lemmy.ml/post/49710604

[–] notfromhere@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

That’s fair. I didn’t mean MS was the threat actor, just the seed from which this grew. I definitely take that back after reading up more on where machine-id grew out of.

However, I don’t concede that machine-id is theoretical for user fingerprinting. Any software installed can read it, especially a browser. That’s the vector for tracking across the web. Do I have instances of this occurring, no. Seems plausible and the more we can sandbox things, especially “web browsers” (untrusted app runners more like it) the better.

[–] notfromhere@lemmy.ml 6 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (7 children)

Absolutely zero reason a init system needs admin date of birth. Yes separate issue entirely, but it’s showing a trend and the direction things are headed.

https://blog.bofh.it/debian/id_473

[–] notfromhere@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 weeks ago

Cost of doing business

[–] notfromhere@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 month ago

Ah, yes! Light gray text on white background. Perfectly legible.

view more: next ›