lime

kid should have known it was the wrong forum

100g maps directly to percentages. 3.5g sugar per serving, 1 serving is ⅓ cup -> ??% sugar per unit weight. 9g sugar per 100g -> 9% per unit weight. makes it possible to actually calculate nutrient intake in your head.

we don't even list serving sizes on our stuff, just nutrients per 100g so you can count it yourself

that's just jk simmons again

i heard jason alexander

let's make them enjoy it less

maybe because it's not true, at least if what the ex-head writer said on bsky is to be believed.

serious answer: they don't know how to prompt. not that knowing how to prompt makes it look better, but it can at least make it look different. like how google used to give you more specific results if you formulated the query in a certain way.

yeah the swedish name for carbonated drinks is literally kolsyrad, "carbonic acid-ed".

the more co2 we put in the atmosphere, the more carbonated the oceans will become

door bells here are just literal bells mounted to the door. modern problems require modern solutions.

i think the big issue is asymmetry. they charge at 3C, but they discharge at 8C. so you need the significantly overbuild.