iglou

Because income sources like subscriptions and ads are stable, predictable, and that makes shareholders happy.

That's definitely also a reason why they're thinking about this system. If people sell them back their old phones or lease them, the second hand market will suffer immensely.

Putting the slightest chance of profits over the conservation of rare books is also pure malice in my book. With a layer of makeup.

I'm surprised to see lemmy users defending liberticide and authoritarian decisions.

I wasn't aware that there was such an advanced compatibility layer! This is good news!

Then Solarpunk is a bad example :) And the compatibility coverage is higher than I thought. But, since it isn't close to complete, especially as you said when it comes to esports titles, which are extremely popular, it's still the honest route to mention that when recommending Linux gaming.

It might be enough to make me finally do the switch on my gaming PC, though.

The first category is still definitely under-covered by linux compatibility. If I look at the game I am currently playing, recently released, Solarpunk, I can't run it on Linux. I didn't have to look very far.

So, no, it is not only e-sports titles. It's going in the right direction, but it's still not enough for Linux to be a good recommendation for gaming over Windows.

If people want to switch to Linux for gaming, that's fantastic. But the incessant "Don't go for Windows, go for Linux" push without mentioning that you won't be able to play all the same titles does piss me off.

I'm not talking about performance, I'm talking about compatibility. Still too many games simply need Windows. Until this is no longer an issue, linux is not a viable alternative to recommend to gamers, or at least not without mentioning that a good chunk of AAA games will not be playable.

But just like any community, Lemmy users are strongly opinionated, so I was expecting the irrational downvotes :)

I'm aware, and yet, that is not what an authoritarian government is... But sure, continue to spread your ignorance and double down with dull insults, that will do a lot!

Ah! So you consider that every single restriction a country applies makes it authoritarian. Yeah, I don't think you understand authoritarianism, and in today's context, that's dangerous.

But I won't lose sleep over it!

Absolutely not! I encourage you to re-read the definition of authoritarianism and research a bit more about the governments all around the world!

It absolutely is. Have a look at the definition of authoritarianism, China checks all the boxes.