fushuan

joined 1 year ago
[–] fushuan@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 1 day ago (2 children)

GDPR should in theory prohibit them from putting it for sale in the first place in a bankruptcy scenario, but if they are bound to disappear, there's no one to go after so idk...

I'm mentioning European regulations in a post about an American airline company just because you said any, and yeah, I'm bound to disagree there.

In any case, I already didn't trust any American company since they can be subpoenaed and they are bound by law to give all the data to the government, which looks as or more evil than the general evil American company rn.

[–] fushuan@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 1 week ago

I was around when smartphones were introduced to the market, I had to learn how to use them and teach everyone on my family, and I don't recall the concern. Maybe I was too young to care.

In any case, I'm not against what you are presenting here not the technology itself, I'm just telling you why the trust is being broken. As you described it with phones, context matters, and the fact that the main glass producers right now are who they are is a massive factor on public perception.

In fact, I use glasses and it would be cool to have some AR on them. I hope that the huge negative perception of these glasses push others to create more security/privacy aware glasses and expand the market so people that have real use for them like blind people can make use of the technology without being subjected to the negative perception of the RayBan Meta glasses.

[–] fushuan@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 1 week ago

You are not understanding the trust issue.

By default, patents trust doctors with their bodies so they don't expect the doctor to do shady stuff like record them with a hidden camera. However, the moment they see something that suggest they might be recording,then the hidden voice awakens and questions everything the doctor has done in a new, not so trustworthy way.

It's not that patients think that doctors who wear those glasses won't have a hidden camera too, it's that doctors who have those glasses might also have a hidden camera, it's the fact that they have those glasses that opens the patient to other shady possibilities.

As others have said, trust is broken.

[–] fushuan@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Smartphones haven't been called "pervert boxes". It's the implication of what someone that would buy and wear the glasses would also be able to do.

We implicitly trust doctors just because doctors are generally trustworthy for body things. At the same time, the pervert glasses are called pervert glasses because people have used them for that stuff and we implicitly distrust people that wear them because of the implication.

So if I see a doctor with pervert glasses on even go they are not recording, I'm immediately distrustful of their phone too. The trust of them being a doctor is immediately broken.

I hope I was clear, it's not if the phones can more easily record or not, it's the current general perception of those glasses and how it warps peoples perception of others.

[–] fushuan@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 1 week ago (5 children)

You are not understanding the trust issue.

By default, patents trust doctors with their bodies so they don't expect the doctor to do shady stuff like record them with a hidden camera. However, the moment they see something that suggest they might be recording,then the hidden voice awakens and questions everything the doctor has done in a new, not so trustworthy way.

It's not that patients think that doctors who wear those glasses won't have a hidden camera too, it's that doctors who have those glasses might also have a hidden camera, it's the fact that they have those glasses that opens the patient to other shady possibilities.

As others have said, trust is broken.

[–] fushuan@lemmy.blahaj.zone 26 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

He and his brother created tons of online free science material that was used by several high schools apparently. I found him post all that, but it's understandable that a lot of people have leeway with him, given that he was a big helper in so many places, and that he got cancer.

I mean, look how hostile Lemmy usually is and how tactful they are being with him, he definitely has built some reputation of being a good guy.

[–] fushuan@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

So french, Italian, Spanish, German, Lithuanian, and every other country I refuse to list (sorry if so left your out) don't count?