fonix232

joined 3 years ago
[–] fonix232@fedia.io 1 points 2 months ago

Nope, as only ~4 people remained at that point, and they wouldn't even be thinking of researching this topic.

[–] fonix232@fedia.io 7 points 2 months ago (6 children)

NONE of that data can predict a random occurrence discussion that goes in a specific direction.

A great example is something that happened to me in 2015. One night I was out with friends, and one of them had a really bad panic attack. The next day I was discussing it with a colleague during a smoke break, who recommended he gets a clip-on pulse oximeter. No searches, nothing, literally just a half minute detour in our chat. I repeat, nothing was typed in or looked up or in any way entered into any computer intentionally.

Five minutes later we're sitting in front of our respective computers and I start getting ads for the very thing. Mind you, we're still at a point where nothing noted during this discussion was entered into any computer. Explain this.

[–] fonix232@fedia.io 25 points 2 months ago (27 children)

That's been happening for well over a decade now, and while "respectable security researchers" call it bullshit... there's simply too much anecdotal evidence for it to happen organically.

[–] fonix232@fedia.io 51 points 2 months ago

Shitty, old processors? In which way?

Zen 4 is literally just a single generation behind current latest gen architecture. And you're way off on the pricing too - Zen5 APUs are essentially the AI 300/400 lineup, of which the higher end models still cost well over what Valve would find affordable. Meanwhile the GPU Valve chose to be integrated into the SM is 30-40% more performant than the 890M bundled with the Ryzen AI 370 (the only affordable kinda-high-end Zen5 APU).

So no, it's neither old nor shitty.

[–] fonix232@fedia.io 0 points 8 months ago (1 children)
view more: ‹ prev next ›