communist

joined 2 years ago
[–] communist@lemmy.frozeninferno.xyz 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (4 children)

Regardless many ai classifiers outperform humans at classifying. Your comment seems irrelevant to the discussion.

[–] communist@lemmy.frozeninferno.xyz 9 points 1 month ago (13 children)

Ai can do plenty of classification tasks better than humans though. It's not like every entity that trains another is fundamentally smarter.

[–] communist@lemmy.frozeninferno.xyz 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I would only really get a linux tablet, I'm with you on that, I plan to use a metal lapdesk with a charachorder and magnets which will mitigate the exact issues you're talking about while also letting me take a tablet on my flights so less bulk. Gotta get a bit creative if you're doing it that way but it is doable.

[–] communist@lemmy.frozeninferno.xyz 1 points 1 month ago (3 children)

You can plug in a keyboard

I don't see how it's subjective.

[–] communist@lemmy.frozeninferno.xyz 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)

You're confusing the olympiad with the erdos conjecture. This is just really not true, they just asked it and it found a solution, the mathmatician then used its solution as inspiration to create a better one. It still essentially did it on its own, and they certainly do the olympiad on their own.

[–] communist@lemmy.frozeninferno.xyz 1 points 2 months ago (4 children)

I am not, you inaccurately said that the math olympiad was not bested by llm's because they had a tool that told them if they were close but incorrect and can just try an infinite number of times. This is incorrect, they had a number of tries with python. This just isn't a true statement. I think them besting it with use of python is equally significant and still counts as them besting it, and saying they can't do math work is absurd.

[–] communist@lemmy.frozeninferno.xyz 1 points 2 months ago (6 children)

I don't know what you mean, I wasn't the one who claimed they couldn't do something they clearly can.

[–] communist@lemmy.frozeninferno.xyz 1 points 2 months ago (8 children)

You aren't, and that's exactly what I'm saying, it's capable of doing these things with tools, therefore it's capable of doing these things.

[–] communist@lemmy.frozeninferno.xyz 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (10 children)

I'm academically interested, what I mean when I say I'm not interested is that I just don't see the significance when we're talking about if it's capable of the task.

[–] communist@lemmy.frozeninferno.xyz 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (12 children)

The calculator does not tell them if they're getting closer? This isn't how anything works. No I can't say I'm very interested in whether or not the llm has access to python/a calculator as long as it completes the task, that doesn't matter.

It does the math, it just uses a calculator.

view more: ‹ prev next ›