aquovie

joined 1 year ago
[–] aquovie@lemmy.cafe 1 points 1 month ago

MA. Tickets have "I'd like to pay" or "I'd like a hearing". No mention of guilt.

Hearings are civil, not criminal, and you represent yourself in front of a magistrate (baby judge). If you tried to represent yourself in a criminal case, the judge would give you a very hard time about that choice. Either way, you don't call witnesses, there's no cross examination, and no discovery.

I don't get where people are going full Law&Order, demanding to see their accuser.

[–] aquovie@lemmy.cafe 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

The (Australian) law actually says you can't have your phone out (face up/down doesn't matter). And I think the law is consistent with other common sense traffic safety:

  • You can't have an open beer bottle within reach
  • You can't have a firearm within reach

Phone use has been shown to be equivalent (or in some cases, far worse) to driving over the BAC limit.

[–] aquovie@lemmy.cafe 5 points 1 month ago

Or more concisely: the government should never contract out law enforcement to private companies.

[–] aquovie@lemmy.cafe 2 points 1 month ago (4 children)

Have you ever fought a traffic ticket? You’re not on trial. You’re not pleading guilty/not-guilty. It’s an administrative/civil thing.