_Nemo_

joined 1 month ago
[–] _Nemo_@lemmy.ml 9 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

Fuck you very much for conflating privacy with illegality.

[–] _Nemo_@lemmy.ml 15 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

“When gold was at US$4500, silver should have been US$300, but has been suppressed for all these 50-odd years by banks who’ve been short the whole time – and maybe I should get mad at myself for playing in a game where it’s manipulated, right?”

Read: "I should have won bigly, but I didn't. But my ego tells me I can't be wrong, so the game must have been rigged."

Boy, does that remind me of someone...

Fuck this guy, the other guy, and fuck their corrupt moneymaking schemes.

[–] _Nemo_@lemmy.ml 131 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (9 children)

"Using free Chinese models that you can run locally and offline is a security risk. People and businesses high on AI should be forced to use our expensive cloud-based models that funnel all their data through our servers and can be turned off or price-hiked by us at any moment!"

[–] _Nemo_@lemmy.ml 49 points 4 weeks ago (2 children)

And now, everyone!

"IN THE LAND OF THE FREE
AND THE HOME OF THE BRAVE!"

[–] _Nemo_@lemmy.ml 3 points 4 weeks ago

That's the thing: if constituents only get their info (or opinions) through chatbots...

[–] _Nemo_@lemmy.ml 12 points 4 weeks ago

...by axing or redirecting (read: embezzling) funds once spent on actual science?

[–] _Nemo_@lemmy.ml 16 points 1 month ago (3 children)

So... Here's another resource that will become available again once the bubble pops?

[–] _Nemo_@lemmy.ml 11 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Good luck expanding that to the rest of the world which is just discovering that, while not perfect, China's open weights models are

a) good enough for 95% or all companies out there
b) a lot cheaper, also because they're
c) self-hostable, meaning: they'll always be available, unlike U.S. cloud AI which you'll be cut off from whenever Diaper Donnie feels it's time for yet another bribe.

[–] _Nemo_@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

It feels like nitpicking, but there's a relevant difference here. If you can only access the weights (and not the training data and the learning algorithms used), it's hard to get (say) a Chinese model to freely talk about Tiananmen Square Massacre. (Just tried it locally on Deepseek R1; it's doable, but takes some prompt hacking.) The models may be freely available, but there's bias and censorship baked into them.

[–] _Nemo_@lemmy.ml 14 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

It's nice that these things are open source

Open weights != open source

[–] _Nemo_@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Well, they do have that fruit basket, so...

[–] _Nemo_@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 month ago

Like showing up to the bank heist in a neon pink monster truck.

view more: next ›