I don't think that's going to go the way you think it will. Exhibit A: Freeing the Genie
Wolf314159
joined 2 years ago
Well, it seems that every time a search engine's AI gives me a definitive and wordy "answer" to a question I search and provides a helpful citation of the page from which it got that answer, it is ALWAYS just a completely hallucinated answer that the cited page in no way supports. This isn't just hyperbole, this has been my experience with every single search engine AI summary
And I find myself having to go back and fix the autocorrect that my phone keyboard "helpfully" makes with increasing frequency. It used to be that autocorrect would just fix a typo when I'd obviously typed gibberish because I missed a key. But now, it is regularly replacing entire words that I've typed completely correctly with some other word that makes absolutely no sense.
I'm all for some specific uses of AI. Things like speech to text or images to text? Sure that's a great use. But when it comes to research, writing, or spreadsheets, AI tools just need to shut up and stay the fuck out of my way. I'm becoming convinced a little more everyday that anyone using AI to summarize articles or search results is a complete moron and shouldn't be trusted.
Clarissa Explains It All maybe?
This is way too coherent.
I'm seeing this post for the first time, sitting at -30. I'm seeing it and yet it's pretty heavily down voted. I'm not browsing by controversial or something like that.
Anyway, downvotes don't really work the same way to hide unpopular posts the way you're used to reddit doing. People aren't enjoying it and are in fact still seeing it, so maybe just check yourself before getting hostile.
According to the article it was royalty free and published open standards, but they do not make any claim to this being an FOSS system.