Maybe not. It's like car enthusiasts refusing any modern car, especially EV that are on paper much more powerful but less fun to tinker and go down country roads.
WanderingThoughts
Setting risk aversion to 11 and still losing
That's car as transport versus car as status symbol. Did you know rich people had large lawns as status symbol back in the day just because they were expensive to maintain? An expensive car in the driveway next to a small patch of grass in a desert climate does the same.
On the other hand, there's surveillance specifically for organized action while unorganized action is much harder to police.
And if you'd use yard, then it's only 9% off. One kiloyard is 0.91 kilometer.
You're still liable as the owner of the gun. You can sue the builder of the gun in turn of course so they go to jail too.
I just switched off history and with that the recommendation screen. I only work with subscriptions on human made channels.
Use and/or for clarity. They're probably both incompetent and malicious.
To illustrate it's only good in stupid stuff like that and not so good for real work.
That's the whole story from the beginning. It's not good and trustworthy enough for the real work but they've poured all that money in there so it needs to be used.
Maybe they can use AI to fix it

People forget that a checkers algorithm is also AI.