Valmond

joined 9 months ago
[–] Valmond@lemmy.dbzer0.com 15 points 2 months ago (25 children)

How many games nowadays are available on a physical medium? Why would this be important?

[–] Valmond@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 2 months ago

Guess which (only) trait all the captured Nazis in Nuremberg shared?

Yeah, our society is not a good place to be in.

[–] Valmond@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 months ago

I have just recently heard of claude.md scripts, care to share some (horror) stories to a newb?

[–] Valmond@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 months ago (8 children)

Hey are you me?!

Yeah I wonder how low I will go for a job, it's not bright exactly...

[–] Valmond@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 2 months ago

One more year...

;-D

[–] Valmond@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 months ago

Lol that's not how you argue in good faith, but sure let's stop this sterile pissing contest.

Bye.

[–] Valmond@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Followed up with:

we cannot prove consciousness (except our own of course) so it'd be you who must prove it can be implemented in a turing machine. Not me.

So yeah I think humans have it, but we cannot prove anyone else than ourselves do.

[–] Valmond@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (4 children)

Dude where did I say we (humans) have quala?

Nowhere.

I do think most of us do, but that there is absolutely no real proof of it.

Now who's moving the goalpost with that eh.

Do feel free to stop wasting my time anytime you like.

[–] Valmond@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 months ago (6 children)

I personally suppose humans all (or 99%+, there are always statistical outliers) have a consciousness actually, but that doesn't mean I can use it as a fact when making an argument. For example, if you do use it as a fact, then why doesn't monkeys have a consciousness, pigs, cats, muskitoes, trees, planks, too, etc etc etc.

Math is based on the idea that 1+1=2 and you take that as granted. I can live with that, it seems reasonable. All humans have a consciousness? Not accepting that if you infer that just because a machine can mimic a human brain, it thus also will have even the possibility to have a consciousness.

Do you think a machine can have a quala, the experience we "experience" because we have a consciousness?

[–] Valmond@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 months ago (8 children)

That makes it probable I guess, but it absolutely does not prove it. We cannot prove humans are conscious (except ourselves).

[–] Valmond@lemmy.dbzer0.com -2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (10 children)

Except we have quala, consciousness. That's a well recognised fact. How do you model something we cannot explain?

So yeah there are "indications" we cannot do it. Maybe we can and emerging properties is the way to go, but it might also not be that.

Do you believe we can?

Edit: the chinese room is a farce IMO, and won't push anything either way.

[–] Valmond@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Totally, and cheaper, well I guess my 3TB, 4TB (under 100€ each) and finally 2TB SSD (200€?) will be the last for a long time lol!

view more: ‹ prev next ›