Undaunted

This much RAM is probably worth more than the GDP of all those countries combined at this point

But this is not what that discussion is about. The person above said that the employees should pay their AI usage with part of their salaries. We're not talking about freelancing or similar.

When I'm employed for 100k a year, 40h per week, I can't just only work 20h per week, but claiming to have worked 40h. My employer would not be very happy about that, because my pay is not directly bound to the amount of deliverables I create but how many hours I actually work.

And with AI they just hope, that I get the work of 60h done in only 40h. If I just work less without disclosing it and someone finds out, I could say goodbye to my job and probably also get sued.

Makes sense, thanks for the heads-up. I'll tag them myself.

But the employers want their employees to use it, (because of some unfounded promises about performance boosts). So I don't really get your point.

Well that is such a unique case. I've never heard any employer being okay with clocking hours that were not actually worked. And in your case it's essentially just a raise with extra steps.

Well that's just working-hour fraud, you can do that even without using AI.

What a stupid take. Why should employee then even consider using it, when the cost for it would directly reduce their salary?