StumblingWasabi
joined 4 months ago
Also I think is partially because of the langued used. "AI" is a concept that doesn't belong to anyone. Dario Amodei, the ceo of Anthropic should be getting much more heat for the crappy things his company has done. (Anthropic is just the first AI company I thought of, I'm not referring to any specific action here)
No. "AI" is not breaking any laws it's just a tool, that's pantamount to saying that guns are breaking laws. It's the companies using genAI that need to be held accountable for breaking the law. I know that's what you mean, but I just want to make sure that the hate properly is directed at the people actually breaking the law. I'm not informed enough to comment on how companies are breaking laws with self driving vehicles.
The feels like a lockpicking lawyer April fools video premice
And here I was stuck trying to figure out how this is loss
Isn't that just not true? I mean it really couldn't matter less since both have enough, but there are more numbers (including decimals) between 0-100 than like -20 to 30 (idk what a good C range is.)
Well now I do
Well that's just being a contrarian, it's not an actual debait or argument.
Not disagreeing, but it could also just be dream logic.
This might just show how little I know, but how would it be running kernel level Anticheat? Steam isn't running as sudo and I assume that you'd need those permissions. I thought games that required kernel anti-cheat simply didn't work on Linux.
Don't give them ideas
I get what your saying, but companies will cash out your trust for money eventually, just a matter of them needing a good quarter