So if it's only millions of non-white people dying that means the world is "stable"?
SpaceCowboy
Why would you try creating a molten core for a planet when you could just put a big magnet at L1 and call it a day?
If you crack open a history book you'll find that a multi-polar world has a lot more war. Napoleonic wars, World Wars, etc. Even in the Cold War when nuclear weapons made it too insane for super powers to fight each other directly, they found ways to have massive proxy wars, like the Korean War and Vietnam War. These wars left over a million people dead each. Then there were all of the various civil wars that the superpowers were involved like the Angolan civil war, that one was about a half million people dead. These conflicts were happening all over the world.
People today shit themselves over Gaza, but that's less than a tenth of casualties compared to the wars that happened in the Cold War and less than 0.2% of WW2. Would you consider wars happening in multiple parts of the world with 10 to 500 times the casualties we've seen in Gaza to be a "stable world"?
Stuff stolen in Alabama and Florida later found in Chicago... that's organized crime, so seems probable they'd have the contacts needed to fence the goods internationally.
But they probably could sell RAM and SSDs at a discount on eBay right now.
The best one is people getting upset over putting ketchup on a hotdog. It's a fucking hotdog, it's completely insane to act like a snob over the condiments people put onto mystery meat.
That sometimes leads to confusing results. When Europeans arrived on the Saint Lawrence river they asked what they called the place. The indigenous people thought they were asking about what the word for village was so told them that word. Then every village they went they thought they were asking the name of the place but were actually asking "is this a village?" and the response was "yes, this is a village." So that led to the assumption the entire region was called that.
Yeah so the indigenous word for "village" was "canada". Woops! When they figured out the mistake it was already on all the maps, so whatever I guess.
Well gemini once put some helpful comments in a code sample it produced for me. The comments were in Korean for some reason.
Having separate interfaces for user settings and system settings makes sense for companies that prevent users from changing system settings.
The Start Menu shit... probably just a strategy to get people to use bing.
Or more likely just continue to use Windows 10 when it's no longer supported.
Microsoft is squeezing everyone with EOL shenanigans. If it becomes commonplace to continue using software when it's no longer supported, this strategy no longer works.
The US will soon be the poor country that's powered by coal and zero regulation.
by and large these things worked on paper/transparencies I would presume.
You have to presume because you weren't involved in helping the people who were used to doing everything on paper learn how to turn on a computer. Do you think people in the past were super qualified and just magically knew how to use a computer in the past? Nobody ever needed help loading a file on a floppy disk and printing it to paper so they can present it to their boss?
There have always been clueless bosses and tech people that had to make things work. If you go back further, why do you think they all had secretaries typing things up?
Yeah it's super-annoying when they do clickbait headlines that exaggerate some asshole's behaviour. It's a huge let down and then it's a weird feeling like "it wasn't actually that bad" mixed with "but oh yeah, fuck that guy for other reasons".