I don't think they are devouring the Garima Gospels, Cuneiform tablets and deleting hieroglyphs from granite but the worry is if we don't stop them now it's a slippery slope and the VHS tapes will be next.
SnailMagnitude
joined 3 years ago
Jesus being readied for the cross by the sinful woman seems kinda 4-6th century 50 Shades of Hyssop and worth a peek, Jacob of Serugh & co.
'Harry Potter publisher' seems more the clickbait:
"Bloomsbury, which is home to the bestselling novelists Sarah J Maas and Susanna Clarke as well as JK Rowling, said it had 14,087 titles listed within the settlement, with a proposed compensation of about $3,000 a title."
You wouldn't download a pdf.....
He pops up in briefly in Marcion's first New Testament in around 140CE and then becomes some kinda patriarch figure in the later 27 book Catholic New Testament and via St Irenaeus.
Scripture is awesome but for the love of God don't be reading the Catholic 27 book NT's like they are history textbooks.
We have no idea who St Paul was or what he wrote either, it's fine.
I'm struggling to find anything that confirms Peter was a real person.
If you just swallow the sacred history of the RCC and run with 'maybe the bible is true' but that works with loads of religions.
You surely can't be reading the Book of Acts as history?
Corporate LAN party
sorry, I should have used the predictive text spellcheck system on my google device to post
The big question is: Could cutting edge LMM's make Netflix content less shit?
The witch hunt vibes seems apt, the maleficarum got really grim in the wake of the printing press and we've got new meme makers now and the pitchforks are being sharpened.
The article kinda hits it home, it's generic hysterical slop and a solid treatment of the matter will likely be available to the public for £300 from an academic press in a year or three if they promise not to share it. Then an llm will eat it and I will be able to get a summary, mixed in with lemmy comments, for my daily token ration from China: the circle of life.
Afaiu it's somewhat easier to wreck the book and one would imagine there's a few books cutting about that whilst not yet fully digital are also not on the endangered species list.
Sharing the knowledge for the greater good is a no go I think, especially in the USA. Me or you can do it on slsk but if a rich corp tries to do it they'll get shafted fast & hard and the massive academic presses will not tolerate upskilling the poor.