And who are you to assert that? How well defined is sentience already?
SlimePirate
joined 9 months ago
Not having a license or not knowing how to use a lawn mower is being useless these days
Breaking news, google spyware removed in favour of another google slop spyware
their patcher app is not it
Morphe's patching Ui is horrible. Even though it allows for more third party sources (though it's insecure), I still prefer using the revanced manager one, which does not look like an emoji filled slop generated simplified app.
How bold using a stalking tool for stalking
definitely French speaker: diurnambule is a porte-manteau between diurne which means "during the day" and somnambule which means sleepwalker.
Having "real intelligence" is not a sufficient requirement to decide over which systems are sentient or not e.g. there are very low IQ "real intelligences".
Dictionary defintions serve for a partial understanding but are not enough to understand scientific concepts, especially definitions that are not under scientific consensus. Moreover, current AI systems, including tool-assisted LLMs can satisfy these definitions.
Since you like exercising your brain, I'd recommend reading about sophisms.
Note that I am not asserting that LLMs are sentient, but that your statement is too confident and that the subject requires actual care.