SlimePirate

Can't wait for you to detail the transformers architecture

Exactly. How entitled.

The argument basically: "'computers are not sentient, because I say that they are not sentient"

Yes they can, easily. That doesn't mean they are sentient though. Just that these are too broad to mean anything.

Have you ever trained a neural network, or studied how they work? I highly doubt so, and I highly doubt you are the computer omniscient you are pretending to be.

I don't think you have the cognitive requirements to understand why your dictionary definitions are completely irrelevant here

I am not fearmongering the fact it helps or not AI companies is not relevant here.

You are getting off topic.

Correct, but phenomenology can be more precise than one opinion

I am starting to think you're sponsored by Merriam-Webster

This dude is a Dunning-Kruger case study. Simply by the shear overconfidence

You can say it, but that's not a proof

Discussing the consciousness of neural networks is NOT being pro-AI. I'd say it's even the opposite, as it displays the danger of such a technology.

Most of the words in the definition have multiple interpretations, it is not as easy as you wish it would be.

Finally, we do NOT at all know how trained neural networks work. We know how training and inference work. We can read the neurons, but the shear size of weights make it a rather impenetrable black box we have to study, partially, to understand the goals of the emergent sub networks.