ProdigalFrog

joined 3 years ago
[–] ProdigalFrog@slrpnk.net 7 points 1 week ago

This is the time for Permacomputing to shine.

!permacomputing@slrpnk.net

[–] ProdigalFrog@slrpnk.net 4 points 2 weeks ago

Modern integrated graphics are actually astonishingly good, the latest AMD desktop APU's can play Cyberpunk 2077 quite well, for instance.

[–] ProdigalFrog@slrpnk.net 5 points 2 weeks ago

It's still good on PC monitors with astigmatism :')

[–] ProdigalFrog@slrpnk.net 17 points 4 weeks ago

This comment in a different thread from someone who used to work for them gives some great background as to why.

[–] ProdigalFrog@slrpnk.net 14 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

The other day I tried installing Star Wars Dark Forces 2 from disk, complete with a 'windows 95/98 compatible' blurb on it. Heroic launcher got the installer running without issue and within a few minutes it was playing.

I ended up using the Openjkdf2 engine instead for some nice quality of life improvements, but it was still quite something to see Linux run a piece of software from 1997 so effortlessly.

[–] ProdigalFrog@slrpnk.net 1 points 4 weeks ago

They absolutely do put on government backdoors, but most people aren't going to be personally targeted by that, but they are likely to get hit with non-fed malware, like keyloggers to steal accounts, botnets, identity theft, etc.

Not that it justifies it, fuck Microsoft, but you get what I mean?

[–] ProdigalFrog@slrpnk.net 1 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago) (2 children)

I am in no way disagreeing that Windows 11 is a shit show, and wildly less secure than Linux, but realistically as bad as it is, it's still going to have less open and known vulnerabilities than Windows 7.

[–] ProdigalFrog@slrpnk.net -1 points 1 month ago (5 children)

I agree with everything you're saying here besides security. Windows 10 and 11 have received hundreds if not thousands of additional security patches that 7 never will receive, which would be crucial to using the internet safely today.

However, 11 (and to a lesser extent 10) has horrific privacy invasive features built in, so it's very much a trade-off there, making Linux the only option to have both security and privacy.

[–] ProdigalFrog@slrpnk.net 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

But Codeberg just doesn't want cryptocurrency scams, and Anubis isn't a currency, it has no ability to pump and dump like cryptocurrencies can. Proof-of-work to weed out bots has little similarity in practical usage with proof-of-work to waste electricity for a digital number that is more often a scam than not.

[–] ProdigalFrog@slrpnk.net 8 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Anubis isn't a currency, though.

[–] ProdigalFrog@slrpnk.net 36 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (3 children)

People can look up how various grocery store brands fund the republicans here: https://shophowyouvote.com/

[–] ProdigalFrog@slrpnk.net 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Ultimately worker coops by their design limit the amount of excess money that can be siphoned off and concentrated to CEO's and shareholders, so capital holders would likely refuse to invest in co-ops in fear that were they to become the standard way of organizing businesses, they would get a smaller and smaller piece of the pie globally, as more wealth is distributed to the workers themselves instead.

The current system of capitalism is inherently designed to oppose all forms of more equal distribution of power and wealth.

If co-ops were to become successful in spite of that, the capital owners would likely attempt a military coup to literally fight back against it, just as they attempted during the Business Plot in response to FDR's economic reforms.

The capital holders hold a tremendous amount of the power to influence the globe to their will due to their concentrated wealth, which is only possible to accumulate due to the accepted exploitation of labor. They will do everything in their power to prevent the loss of that power, even if it means sub-optimal profits.

view more: next ›