OrgunDonor

joined 3 years ago
[–] OrgunDonor@lemmy.world 13 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

And yet despite all your bluster, Canada has more freedom and rights than the USA.

https://worldpopulationreview.com/country-rankings/freedom-index-by-country

By every metric measured Canada is better.

Also, your talking about people laying down, while your country is actively going down the shitter. Your boots are already off.

[–] OrgunDonor@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I see a lot of people saying everyone is mad, but can't say I have really seen many (or any), actually mad.

I have seen a lot of disappointment and indifference. From the people who had put rockstar on some pedestal it's mostly disappointment as they can't believe they would be that scummy. For others not hyped, its an advert.

I am a little surprised, but not shocked they would stoop to getting paid for it. But I am much closer to anti rockstar these days, and have no interest in gta6 anymore.

[–] OrgunDonor@lemmy.world 6 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

I don't know when it was but realising the American dream was garbage, and I don't want to travel to the USA was strange.

It wasn't like a big hit to the face, it was just a slow crumbling of the idea from media.

When you watched friends and saw people in these massive apartments, or huge mcmansions in other shows, it was always something to strive towards, now I actively dislike it. I would hate to live somewhere like that.

There are(were at least, who knows how much longer they will last) some incredible and beautiful places in America, but I also don't want to risk my life flying there (and it isn't the planes).

[–] OrgunDonor@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago

I mean, along with being complete sell outs, I think they are also just creepy people as well.

They fit the smart glasses personality.

[–] OrgunDonor@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

Netflix viewers: "There is more than 1 season to these shows?"

[–] OrgunDonor@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I never had any issues with the vibrations causing damage. Would definitely be something to consider, as I can see the reasoning about it damaging something like the zoom functionality. Mine was on a out front mount so maybe that helped reduce it?

As for the kayak incident, I posted it in replay to someone else, but here is the story:

Hahaha, in brief. cycling out from my old seaside village, getting to the crest of a very steep hill(just shy of 20%) and get over taken by a pickup on a blind corner, thankfully no traffic coming the other way, but hit the downhill part and it is fast 80kmh speed limit down a country lane with 2 lanes of traffic. I hit about 70kmh, and the pickup is pulling away slowly.

Then the kayak shaped missile launches out of the bed as it hadnt been secured properly. Hits the road in front of me, I try to dodge, but it slides across like it is homing in on me. On the brakes as much as I can be in the small window I had to react and drop some speed before it clobbers the front of my bike. The rest I am sure you can imagine as a bike comes to a sudden stop and I dont.

[–] OrgunDonor@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

Yea breaking stigmas is always the most uphill battle. I know it is not the same, but you see a lot of resistance to better tech in cycling. Things like disc brakes which are just better(outside of the tiny minority of cases) having so much fight against them.

I will say i am pretty opposed to the tech in many normal cases. Especially as it just seems like such a massive privacy nightmare at best. Or just shoe horning in tech for no real reason. I do think that everyone is already so in grossed in tech(I know I am a lot of the time) that they forget to just look around them and take in the world, and I think that smart glasses are that tipping point of going to far for most people.

I am happy to see that some really good use cases have been brought up, I am not all knowing I would in fact call me ignorant about a lot of things as I can only know what I know. But almost every good(even great) reason I have read has been based around improving life and interactions for people with disabilities which I can honestly get behind.

[–] OrgunDonor@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago

Hahaha, in brief. cycling out from my old seaside village, getting to the crest of a very steep hill(just shy of 20%) and get over taken by a pickup on a blind corner, thankfully no traffic coming the other way, but hit the downhill part and it is fast 80kmh speed limit down a country lane with 2 lanes of traffic. I hit about 70kmh, and the pickup is pulling away slowly.

Then the kayak shaped missile launches out of the bed as it hadnt been secured properly. Hits the road in front of me, I try to dodge, but it slides across like it is homing in on me. On the brakes as much as I can be in the small window I had to react and drop some speed before it clobbers the front of my bike. The rest I am sure you can imagine as a bike comes to a sudden stop and I dont.

[–] OrgunDonor@lemmy.world -2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

For me, this doesn't solve anything. This is looking for something to fit tech in.

You can already do this with your phone, and it isn't like checking your phone whilst walking is going to kill you or someone else (unlike using your phone whilst driving).

You can also use the sign posts around you, my city has more than enough for people walking to get where the need, or at least the rough area.

You can also use headphones for the verbal call outs.

Another alternative would be a smart watch. Loads have maps or bread crumb style maps.

The real answers have been for more disability or accessibility not seeing Google maps constantly while walking.

[–] OrgunDonor@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago

This, this is a really good answer. Thanks for bringing it up.

[–] OrgunDonor@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago (2 children)

And I asked because I am ignorant about some of them. I also think a lot of what has been posted has been looking for a problem, not solving something.

Needing Google maps when walking? Is honestly a terrible reason. Phones, sign posts, smart watches all already solve this.

Someone just posted about closed captions when people are talking to them due to a disability, that's a really good reason to have some kind of smart glasses.

For your situation, I don't think smart glasses are really the answer, and are more of a band-aid. The real answer in my mind is using the sheet notes and getting the stigma changed(but I understand that is a lot, lot, lot harder than just getting smart glasses).

[–] OrgunDonor@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

Yeah that's a good reason. How do you interact with them them though? Cause if it is hands or voice commands I don't think I see much benefit over having a phone mounted(things are already expensive and only getting more so).

If it is eye tracking for people who have issues interacting with a phone in other ways then, that would certainly be a huge leap forward for accessibility.

view more: next ›