MalReynolds

Also keep an eye on those Supply Charges, they add up. For reference, my origin (non-solar) is $1.42 and I've been watching it ratcheting up for the last decade. 2.72 - 1.42 = 1.3 * 90 days is $117 difference.

Basically, Gov says make it free, power companies say OK, move shit around so they're making the same or more. The only way a consumer wins is if they have a large battery (Home or EV) they can charge at home during the period and use enough power, everyone else loses.

IMO you likely can't, certainly hasn't even gotten close yet. Bodes badly for alignment of anything more general. Kind of makes it irresponsible to advocate (and sell) using it on anything important, no?

Fair cop, probably should have got it. But rather out of context here without ascribing it.

Really? I'm inclined to blame that on the manufacturer. If 'AI' guardrails fail that spectacularly, it's on the provider. I fail to see any way to blame society, other than perhaps not voting in more sanity, but that's pretty indirect.

What if you bowl your ball normally down the lane and of its own initiative it goes and hacks a website?

It's a TIGER, so what if you only have the tail?, you have the tail of a TIGER

This is what happens when advertisers get to rule.

For one state, you've got 50, right? Precedent like this declares open season. Suck it Meta.

They made hundreds and 16 worked (when synthesized by humans), seems stochastic to me. Humans do better to my knowledge (I'm out of touch but do have a relevant background). It's based on LLM architecture (using genes and proteins in place of language), also known as a stochastic parrot, which was the sense in which I was using it.

I don't deny it's a scary technology, more because of the likelihood of mistakes (or as AI companies like to say, 'hallucinations', anthropomorphising as advertising) than any intention.

As usual with this type of technology you need to be competent with the field before it becomes a force multiplier, and those people could already make viruses, and have been able to for a long time. For example, one of the previous stochastic methods was randomized mutation in a specific environment.

I'd say it'd take a fair bit more, but it's a risk, hence

double down on the manufacturing security

We've been living with the human capability to make and deliver super lethal viruses for what 40+ years and have methods in place to control it at the manufacturing level. 'genAI' is way too incompetent at this stage to achieve both a functional virus and evade those manufacturing safeguards and likely LLMs always will be, too stochastic. This is quite aligned to look how scary our AI is marketing.

That said, virus is one of the studied extinction event scenarios for a true AGI/ASI. It would be prudent to double down on the manufacturing security, or, you know, go Butlerian at least until we have an excellent grasp on alignment (IMO you can't align an ASI, it's literally beyond our comprehension). But capitalism's gonna capitalist, existential threat be damned, just look at global warming.

Presumably this has been quietly going along while Musk's neurolink shitshow has been getting the headlines. Here's to responsible usage of BCIs like this, and never letting whatever neurolink is and wants to become (seems torment nexusy to me) anywhere near any of our brains.