Recording inherently means saving. The exact definition includes the word “permanent”. Arguing that recording in this case means “the image data exists in memory” is a level of semantics that means literally nothing in this argument. Yes, we are all quite aware that the image data exists in one form or another when the camera is on. The question is, is it creating a recording, streaming that out, or handling the data locally and disposing of the data before it reaches permanent storage.
KairuByte
joined 3 years ago
Eh? An LLM is a large language model. A language model would have no way to analyze an image. No matter the name assigned to it, it is literally impossible for it to be an LLM.
If you are misusing LLM to mean machine learning model, then… I mean stop using LLM because it’s just plainly incorrect.
There’s also the fact that current generation visual intelligence is image only. It doesn’t support video. Which makes a lot of sense, because streaming out high definition video would be quite the bandwidth requirement, and doing that constantly while someone is wearing AirPods would be insane.
The idea that cameras inherently imply recording is also kinda silly. Eye tracking in VR headsets use cameras, I promise that unless you do some hijinks those camera feeds are not recorded. Just like the camera on my robot vacuum, or the rear view camera on my car. All video recording requires cameras, but not all cameras require video recording.
Er, visual intelligence isn’t an LLM. It processes the image to determine what is being looked at, including text and attempts at context.
Also, the fact that it’s going to the phone is a given, meaning it’s a feature that would be tied to a specific generation of phone or newer.
It could go so far as to require the generation released with it, which could absolutely have the models on device.
That said, all of this, on both sides, is speculation. There’s no guarantee it’s even getting cameras.
We know literally nothing about the end product beyond the fact that it is rumored to have cameras and visual intelligence. And of course that it will have the other features current gen AirPods have.
There’s no reason to assume it will be able to record, or that the visual intelligence won’t require a new phone with local models.
What? Was this about Gas leak or something?
Honestly, if the data stays on device and it’s not recording then idgaf. Local stuff has never really bothered me.
Why the hell are we planning things? To give evidence of intent? To give evidence of a conspiracy to commit a crime?
If you’re going to break the law, you do it anonymously and without announcing your intentions.
You don’t think a signed first edition of Moby Dick would be rare or valuable? O.o
.> Local to… Ukraine? Why does this feel like a conspiracy theory? Ukraine, in the middle of a war, is focusing their efforts on an LLM, destroying books in the process?
Are you a plant?
They may very well be doing just that, but it’s really fucking weird to bring it up in a post about Amazon destroying rare books in the US.
No?
What tools allow you to compile for the iPhone without Xcode? And what services are providing free… whatever you want to call that, since you can’t use Xcode without a Mac, and you can’t program in anything but Xcode for iPhone.
Unless you’re talking about PWA “apps” which are not in any way a native app, and are essentially just a webpage running in a safari container?
You’re suggesting every student out their phone in a bag, and use the honor system when taking it out?
We don’t even know if there will actually be cameras.