I write that in my first sentence : "I dislike this article because it hides important facts until the last section"
You also make it sound like I'm defending MS - that confuse me quite a bit too since I'm actually stating in my comment that they did something shitty.
Clear now?
You disagree with what? Do you think it is great journalism to hide that information to the very end of the article?
MS clearly did something shitty, not arguing about that.
Agreed, but not my argument.
It’s very unprofessional by MS and they should be shamed for it, I’m not arguing against that. I’m only saying I think this article is bad.
I dislike this article because it hides important facts until the last section: "I am in touch with Microsoft about OneDrive Photos, and my early findings suggest that it was an unintended rollout. An apology should be coming soon."
So, this journalist/news site shames Microsoft for doing something shitty, while doing something shitty themselves.
I see it differently, I think it makes quite a difference whether it was intentional or not.